Episode Transcript

Top Five Pet Peeves of 2008
Episode 149: December 19, 2008

Grammar Girl here.

Today I'm announcing the top five Grammar Girl pet peeves of 2008.

About a month ago, I asked Grammar Girl listeners to submit their pet peeves for consideration for the peeves of 2008 list, and boy, do you have a lot of peeves! What surprised me most was how little overlap there was between all your peeves. I expected there to be clear winners, but there weren't. I don't know if you read other people's comments and decided not to post if your peeve was already there or if you're all so different that everyone just has his or her own peeve. Some of your annoyances did fall into groups like classic errors and political speech, so I tried to make sure that those groups were represented in the final list.

Before we get into the final list, I have one honorable mention for Joshua Heimann whose complaint didn't make the list but did make me laugh. He complained about people making up words like "conversate" and "pronunciate" and noted that it needed to terminate, not stopitate.

And now, the list --

Carelessness

At number five, we have carelessness. You hate seeing errors in professionally produced materials, you hate seeing errors in comment posts where other people are talking about their peeves, and most of all, you hate it when people call you pedantic for caring about language. So number five on the 2008 pet peeves list is a careless attitude about language.

Myself

Number four is misuse of the word "myself." Many of your pet peeves fall into the classic category -- the kind of language errors that we hear year in and year out and aren't particularly special to 2008. You hate it when people misuse "less" and "fewer," use the wrong version of "your" and "their," mispronounce words such as especially and espresso, and have verbal tics such as using "like" every four words.  But the biggest pet peeve in this category, the one that is number four on our list, is when people misuse the word "myself." "Send the message to Squiggly and myself" is wrong; it's "Send the message to Squiggly and me." "Myself and Bob are going to the meeting" is wrong; it's "Bob and I are going to the meeting."

Tap

Number three on our list is overuse of the word "tapped," as in Obama tapped so-and-so for secretary of lawn mowing. Peeves about political speech were rampant this year. Many of the suggestions for peeve of the year that I received had some connection to the election. People were annoyed that politicians altered their pronunciation to sound folksy, misused the word "enormity," spoke about "an historical election," misused "Democrat" as an adjective, and overused phrases like "double down" and "team of rivals."

But the winner in the political speech category is the overuse of the word "tapped." The Oxford English Dictionary includes a definition meaning "to appoint" for the word "tap," but also indicates that the use is a U.S. colloquialism, meaning it's questionable to use it in formal situations. All through the election we heard about people being tapped for positions, and it's only gotten worse with Obama making so many recent appointments. There's nothing technically wrong with using "tap" in this way, and I know it's a short word that can fit nicely into a tight headline, but I'd like to suggest to headline writers that there are other words they might consider using, including "appointed," "selected," "chose," and "designated."

As an aside, I think it is amusing that another slang meaning of the word "tap" is to arrest someone. The meaning comes from police tapping people on the shoulder right before they arrest them. Let's hope the people being tapped for political positions aren't eventually tapped in that other sense of the word.

Baby Bump

Number two on the list of 2008 pet peeves is the phrase "baby bump." When I read Erica Podegracz's suggestion of this phrase for peeve of the year I knew it had to be on the list! It's not in any regular dictionary, but the Urban Dictionary, a site where people can enter their own definitions for terms, calls a baby bump "The protruding abdominal bump from a woman's stomach when she becomes noticeably pregnant (1)."  The Celebrity Baby Blog did a story back in March about the origins of the term and they believe it started in Britain about four years ago (2), but it seems to them that the phrase is gaining popularity, and it seems to me that it's being overused. All year we were hearing about baby bumps on Jennifer Garner, Angelina Joile, Ashlee Simpson, and various other celebrities who may or may not be pregnant. Some people think it is cute and descriptive, but to me, it sounds so descriptive as to be childish -- like when someone asks for a purple snow cone instead of a grape snow cone.

Slay

And finally, the top pet peeve of 2008 is the use of the word "slay" as a noun. Fred Firestine from New York first pointed out the trend to me. For example, a recent headline from Fox News read "Slay Suspect Amanda Knox Stars in Feature Film in Jail." Which prompted Fred to ask "slay suspect? Shouldn't it be 'slaying suspect'?" And once Fred pointed it out, he and I both kept seeing more examples. For example, CBS news wrote "N.J. Slay Suspect Confesses," the Boston Herald wrote "Fare Found Guilty in Cabbie Slay," and the use seems common at the New York Daily News which has repeatedly used "slay" this way. It seems to be confined to headline writing for now, so I'm guessing that the writers are using it to save space, but it's just plain wrong.

In every one of those headlines "slay" is being used as a noun or in the place of a gerund such as "slaying." But I dutifully checked all my dictionaries and the only definition of "slay" as a noun has something to do with weaving and looms. "Slay" is a verb -- "to slay," meaning "to kill." Someone can be a slayer and an incident can be a slaying, but to say someone is a slay suspect isn't good English. Substitute some other nouns to see how silly this use is. You wouldn't say "Adidas is selling more run shoes" or "Shoot suspect evades police." So in the hope of stopping this trend before it becomes more widespread, I name the misuse of "slay" as the top Grammar Girl pet peeve of 2008.

So there you have it.

The top five Grammar Girl pet peeves of 2008 are

5. Carelessness
4. Myself
3. Tap
2. Baby bump
1. Slay

Thanks to everyone who submitted a peeve. I enjoyed reading through them and I'll use many of them as topics for future shows or even more likely as topics for the grammar tips that now come out in the daily e-mail newsletter.

Administrative

Despite all the peeves in the world, 2008 was a great year. Last week iTunes named Grammar Girl one of the best podcasts of 2008, so thank you to everyone who left five-star reviews at iTunes. None of what I do would be possible without the amazing support listeners have provided over the years.

And finally, I don't do this alone, so I need to thank all the people who help. Dan Feierabend does the sound production on the show every week and makes sure the podcast and transcript get posted where they need to be, Cherylyn Feierabend is my part-time assistant and among other things helps manage our increasingly complex production schedule and the flood of email messages listeners send every week, Bonnie Trenga and Steve Thornton are my copy editors and do their best to keep me from making stupid mistakes, and Richard Rhorer is the director of digital business development; most of his work is behind the scenes, but most recently he made it possible for us to start delivering daily grammar tips by email. The awards Grammar Girl receives are as much theirs as they are mine.

That's all. Thanks for listening.

References

1. "Baby Bump" Urban Dictionary. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=baby%20bump (accessed December 18, 2008).
2. "The Washington Post investigates the origin of 'baby bump'" Celebrity Baby Blog. March 4, 2008. http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/the-washington.html (accessed December 18, 2008)

 

Cite This Article

 
APA Style
Fogarty, M. (2008, December 18) Top Five Peeves of 2008. Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. Retrieved Dec. 18, 2008, from http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/2008-grammar-pet-peeves.aspx
Chicago Style
Mignon Fogarty, “Top Five Peeves of 2008,” Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing, December 18, 2008, http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/2008-grammar-pet-peeves.aspx (accessed Dec. 18, 2008).
MLA Style Fogarty, Mignon. “Top Five Peeves of 2008.” Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing (accessed Dec. 18, 2008). <http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/2008-grammar-pet-peeves.aspx>.

 


Comments (43) for Top Five Pet Peeves of 2008 |  Subscribe to Comment

Omorose Panya Says:
11/3/2009 4:58:55 PM
By the way, Lottie, I wouldn't worry about "baby bump" or "bump". You'll find that many grammarians have little respect for cultural diversity. The ones who do are typically deemed "lenient" and, as a result, are eaten alive.
Omorose Panya Says:
11/3/2009 4:55:22 PM
...Of all the things to give a damn about.
RS Says:
10/13/2009 1:01:35 AM
Thank you to Kevpod for the headline explanation. As a newspaper headline writer, I recognized the reason for "slay suspect" right away. We do cringe when we have to do things like that, but sometimes it's so hard to describe the story in the space provided. That said, I can't imagine we'd ever get away with that usage here. As for John from Lorain, "murder" is a term that has connotations that are different from "slaying." "Murder" implies premeditation, and it's not interchangeable with "slaying." At least, that's what we are taught in the newspaper industry.
Brian Says:
9/4/2009 6:35:22 PM
I'm not a grammarian, but could people be using "Democrat" as an adjective to avoid implying that a Democrat is more democratic than any other citizen? "He holds Democratic beliefs" can be easily confused with "He holds democratic beliefs." To avoid the confusion, one would say, "He holds Democrat beliefs." How else would a person distinguish whether "he" holds the beliefs of a Democrat versus the beliefs of a person who advocates democracy?
Mark Says:
8/6/2009 8:57:48 PM
Top 40 Grammar Pet Peeves If you are grammatically challenged, or let’s face it, a grammatical snob who will catch the grammatical error in the title of this blog, you owe it to yourself to check out these grammatical pet peeves and tips at <a href="http://penningtonpublishing.com/blog/grammar_mechanics/top-40-grammar-pet-peeves/
Leonora LaMantia Says:
8/3/2009 2:06:58 PM
I was very glad to see 'myself' misuse on the list, as it positively grates on me -- and I've been seeing it A LOT lately. And that reminds me: let grammatical slobs please note that 'a lot' is TWO words, not one.
Mark Says:
8/3/2009 12:33:28 AM
Grammar pet peeves bug me, but so do pronunciation pet peeves. Check out these Top 40 Pronunciation Pet Peeves, but warning… you may cringe on a few that you mispronounce.
Tom Maddox Says:
4/29/2009 3:36:53 PM
In the phrase "slay suspect," the word "slay" is being used as an adjective, not a noun. It modifies "suspect," fairly obviously. It's still awkward and annoying, mind you. And if "slaying" were used, it would be a participle, that is, the present participle of a verb used as an adjective, not a gerund, the ing form of a verb used as a noun.
Tom Maddox Says:
4/29/2009 3:34:12 PM
In the phrase "slay suspect," the word "slay" is being used as an adjective, not a noun. It modifies "suspect," fairly obviously. It's still awkward and annoying, mind you. And if "slaying" were used, it would be a participle, that is, the present participle of a verb used as an adjective, not a gerund, the ing form of a verb used as a noun.
Brian Says:
3/18/2009 10:38:18 AM
chris i beleive the word that you mean is shart...
Tina from OKC Says:
3/14/2009 9:21:39 AM
My pet peeve is when someone says, "This is so hard" when they mean "This is so difficult". I know this is accepted but it still bothers me.
Lori T Says:
2/10/2009 7:55:53 PM
Great peeves and comments- I complained to my boss today that writing which hasn't been proofread makes me cringe (or maybe they have been and the writing is just horrid.) I didn't see my two current major annoyances: the misuse of further and farther; and the irritating overuse of the word "folks" to refer to people, citizens, persons, neighbors, etc..
Kevin T. Hurlbut Says:
2/3/2009 1:25:30 PM
For me I have an "issue" with the overuse and misuse of the word "issue" for nearly everything. I especially don't like "issue" used as a vague substitute for mental and sometimes physical health conditions, as in "Well, he's one of those people who always has issues." What's wrong with "problems"? Or, as I recently heard in a cosmetics ad, "Mature skin has issues all its own." I didn't know skin could have "issues." Or in another ad, "Did you know at least one out of three men face prostate issues?" Why not say, "Did you know at least one out of three men have prostate problems?" I've even heard local weather forcasters talk of rain, storm, hurricane and flood "issues." For me a hurricane or a flood is a lot more than an "issue." "Issue" is so overused on computer tech support sites that nobody has computer problems; they're all "issues." And instead of saying "solve a problem," now it's "resolve an issue." I think it's long past time to retire "issue" for a while and use any number of perfectly adequate synonyms, such as "matter," "concern," "problem," "point of discussion or (disagreement)," "conflict," and a few others. I think "issue" should be reserved for matters and problems which concern a large number of people, such as political issues, as in, "What should the government do about the issue of the high cost of health care?"
Jackson Says:
1/29/2009 11:07:29 AM
I hate it when I read essays with good content but misuses "than" and "then". I read more and more of them.
Jeff Says:
1/21/2009 4:06:30 AM
I found this site after voting closed.... but "utilize" drives me nuts! I'm hearing utilize so often, and it's rare that "use" wouldn't be a better fit when someone says "utilize". I guess it's a subset of a bigger peeve - people using big words when a smaller word works fine. Big words don't make you sound smarter, especially when you don't "utilize" them correctly!
Simon Says:
1/18/2009 2:46:15 AM
What's a good alternative to the cutesy 'baby bump' term? Grossly distended abdomen?
Scotty Says:
1/17/2009 8:40:07 AM
The use of "an" instead of "a" in front of a word starting with "h" when the "h" is NOT silent, has started to drive me completely mad! Example from the recent election, "An historic election." Our local station was doing it and I sent them a very irate e-mail.
Marcia Veach Says:
1/15/2009 3:52:25 PM
I'm behind in my listening, but I wanted to add "perfect storm" to the list of pet peeves. I am SO tired of hearing that phrase!
John Says:
1/8/2009 11:34:10 AM
Thank you for the list of peeves. My pet peeve is the incorrect use of the (thuh) in front of words beginning with a vowel sound.
John from Lorain Says:
1/2/2009 1:48:05 PM
Amy, GG is right to say that "between" can be used in SOME cases that involve more than two entities. However, you are right to say that she should have used "among" in the case that you quoted. Both of you should read the "Usage Note" on this page: http://www.bartleby.com/61/88/B0218800.html
Grammar Girl Says:
1/2/2009 11:50:07 AM
Hi, Amy. Sometimes it is OK to use "between" to refer to more than two things. Grammar Girl episode #26 talks about one instance, and this page from the British Council covers using "between" when considering entries in a competition: http://is.gd/emIE.
Amy Says:
12/31/2008 12:07:17 PM
"What surprised me most was how little overlap there was between all your peeves." Shame on you, Grammar Girl! That sentences should contain the word "among" (referring to multiple items), not "between" (which should only be used when referring to two items).
John from Lorain Says:
12/29/2008 6:26:11 AM
I'll answer your question, "Me Myself and bob." I am going to give you some instances of the proper use of "myself." You will notice that it always follows the pronoun, "I," either immediately or later in the sentence. (1) We do not say, "I hurt me," but we say, "I hurt myself." (2) "I myself went to make the purchase, rather than send one of my children." (3) "I kept half the cake for myself." (4) "I taught myself to play the piano." (5) "I put together the puzzle all by myself." (6) "I am so ashamed of myself." (7) "No charity is required, because I can pay for myself."
Me Myself and bob Says:
12/25/2008 9:40:00 AM
Myself, I'm confused. I'll be honest. What and when is the appropriate time and place for someone, anyone - even myself - to use the word?
John from Lorain Says:
12/24/2008 9:58:42 AM
I agree, JB. I can't stand it when people in the media think that they have the right to force their jargon down our throats. Other examples: (1) making a noun out of "open," as in, "in the open" (meaning, "in the opening sequence of the show) and (2) references to "bumps" (some kind of music or other insertion at the beginning or end of a segment). I'm sure that others here can contribute other such obnoxious terms.
Julie Says:
12/23/2008 2:38:27 PM
Just before reading the top five pet peeves, I saw this in a blog by a national expert in Human Resources (who shall remain nameless): "If you had just awoke from a two year comma, you might think that every American company was on the verge of collapse...." "Had awoke" was certainly careless and annoying, but the "two year comma" made me laugh out loud. Now that would put anyone to sleep.
JB Says:
12/23/2008 1:00:57 PM
My current pet peeve is a fairly new one: the use of "presser" in lieu of "press conference." Bleah.
John Says:
12/23/2008 12:46:43 AM
Who says that "myself" as part of a compound subject is wrong? Why is their opinion more worthy than the opinion of all the good writers who use "myself" as part of a compound subject? I will presume that Mr. Murry and myself can agree... - T. S. Eliot, The Function of Criticism, 1932 ...the Post & not yourself must have been unpunctual - Jane Austen, letter, 1800 William, and Desmoulins, and myself are very sickly - Samuel Johnson, letter, 1782 This usage is in the OED fwiw: 2b. As part of a compound subject or predicate, and after than or as.
Melanie Says:
12/22/2008 2:11:42 PM
My pet peeve is the misuse of "and" in the phrase "try and . . .." I don't mind this when people are speaking because it does trip off the tongue, but in writing!! The classic misuse is something like, "I'm going to try AND go to the movie." It sounds like two separate ideas:. The writer will try (in a general sense) but will definitely "go to the movie." What the writer intends to say is "I'm going to try TO go to the movie."
RenoNV Says:
12/21/2008 1:48:01 AM
While "myself" tops my list, I also shriek when I hear "ascertain" misused as a synonym for "determine". And it seems to go that the one error goes with the other, or as nearly as myself could ascertain!
randy Says:
12/19/2008 10:52:19 PM
"May or may not"? This is a tautology. Consider this for your 2009 list.
Kevpod Says:
12/19/2008 9:40:59 PM
As an Old Media (newspaper)wretch, I guarantee that you would drop your objections to the misuse of "slay" after a week or so of attempting to convey the gist of a story in a newspaper headline. All bets are off in headlinese. In fact it's a grammatical world unto itself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headlinese Those steeped in Web-based media will never know the reverse-joy of having to express something in a fixed font size and space, and usually in a hurry. Other peeves, mostly found in press releases submitted for publication: "The So-and-So Foundation would like to announce its annual meeting..." Is the press release stating that the foundation wishes it could announce the meeting but is somehow frustrated in doing so, or announcing it? How about "The So-and-So Foundation announces its annual meeting..." A related affront to reason is when the So-and-So Foundation "will be holding" their event. How about just "holds?" I will be having frustration next time I have to fix that. Finally, "The So-and-So Foundation should be commended for their fine work." Really? Then we better find someone who can do the commending! How about "The So-and-So Foundation is commended?" And don't even get me started on 9:00pm vs NIne P.M. vs 9 O'clock. (It's 9 p.m.) This is why I pay someone to process press releases.
Kevpod Says:
12/19/2008 8:39:18 PM
As an old media wretch, I can guarantee you that you would drop your objections to the misuse of "slay" after a week or so of attempting to convey the gist of a story in a newspaper headline. All bets are off in headlinese. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headlinese Those steeped in Web-based media will never know the reverse-joy of having to express something in a fixed font size and space, and usually in a hurry. Other peeves, mostly found in press releases submitted for publication: "The So-and-So Foundation would like to announce its annual meeting..." Is the press release stating that the foundation wishes it could announce the meeting, or announcing it? How about "The So-and-So Foundation announces its annual meeting..." A related affront to reason is when the So-and-So Foundation "will be holding" their event. How about just "holds?" I will be having frustration next time I have to fix that. Finally, "The So-and-So Foundation should be commended for their fine work." Really? Then we better find someone who can do the commending! How about "The So-and-So Foundation is commended?" And don't even get me started on 9:00pm vs NIne P.M. vs 9 O'clock. (It's 9 p.m.) This is why I pay someone to process press releases.
zenga Says:
12/19/2008 8:28:26 PM
Hey Grammar Girl, Just subscribed to your podcast, and loved it down to the last word (well, not the commercial). Now, about the 'Myself' peeve, here is another interesting usage of the word for you. In India (and maybe other parts of the world as well) there are many people who introduce themselves using the phrase "Myself Mr. XYZ.", both in person and in emails. Beats anything that you had in your list, doesn't it ?
Paula Says:
12/19/2008 8:05:28 PM
Thank you for identifying one of my biggest pet peeves - MYSELF. UGH! I cringe when I hear executives say "see John or myself" in formal meetings. Another favorite in our family is the misuse of "any more". For example, "any more we have colder days" or"it seems to go that way any more". Thanks for letting me vent. :)
Shirley Says:
12/19/2008 1:40:48 PM
My all-time pet peeve is the use of "over" instead of "more than", as in "Over 100 people attended." instead of "More than 100 people attended."
Grammar Girl Says:
12/19/2008 1:24:17 PM
Hi, Lottie. I talked about "a" versus "an" back in episode 47: http://is.gd/1m9y
Lottie Says:
12/19/2008 1:19:33 PM
Regarding "an historical election", I thought "an" was supposed to be used in front of words that begin with H? Is this a purely British phenomenon? :) I agree with Chris on the use of "literally"! I also apologise on behalf of the UK for "baby bump" - I just say "bump", but perhaps that's bad too. :D Thanks, nice article!
patricia Says:
12/19/2008 1:08:32 PM
It really bugs me when people say "LED lights." Redundancy
Chris Eveley Says:
12/19/2008 12:08:38 PM
My top pet peeve this year, one that went rampant after Biden has been in the media a lot, is the unironic and completely wrong uses of "literally." As in "i literally shat myself when I heard it." Really? Did you in fact defecate in your pants? No? Ah.
John from Lorain Says:
12/19/2008 7:52:40 AM
Rats! I meant to say, "No, we should NOT use either one!"
John from Lorain Says:
12/19/2008 7:49:53 AM
"Which prompted Fred to ask 'slay suspect? Shouldn't it be "slaying suspect?"'" No, we should use either one! To avoid ambiguity, we should use, "murder suspect." The problem with "slay suspect" is obvious. The problem with "slaying suspect" is that "slaying" could be read, not as the noun intended, but as a participial adjective that modifies "suspect" (effectively condemning him/her!).
Dan Says:
12/19/2008 2:42:00 AM
In many cases, Americans do buy "run" shoes which become "sit in the closet" shoes.

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required