﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <copyright>Macmillan Holdings, LLC. Grammar Girl, Grammar Girl's, QDnow, and Quick and Dirty Tips are all trademarks of Macmillan Holdings, LLC.</copyright>
    <description>Today's topic is who versus that.</description>
    <item>
      <author>Bozo de Niro</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>Read the comments above by Matthew and Lance, they make the most sense to me.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=19881#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=19881#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:53:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Bozo de Niro</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>Rob</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>I definitely agree with Grammar Girl on the two main points here: that both who and that are acceptable in standard English, but also that who just makes a lot more sense to me.  There have been some people saying that "that" leaves ambiguity as to what the relative pronoun represents, and I just want to assert that this is absolutely untrue for one important reason: when the relative pronoun is that, it must always come immediately after the noun it represents, leaving no room for misunderstanding.  "Which" is a whole nother story, as they say.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=19815#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=19815#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Rob</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>KS</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>In the example given, is Bob a slave trader selling people ("Bob sold me"), or is he a car salesman ("Bob sold the car to me")?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=19303#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=19303#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>KS</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>Bob</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>I agree that "who" rather than "that" should be used with people.  

I also notice, however, that you have said the following: "To me, using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human."  Since "a person" is singular, you shouldn't have used "them."  Using "people" rather than "a person" would make the sentence correct.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=18687#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=18687#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Bob</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>spacrDemon</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>Yes! Thank you for this confirmation! I thought I was going insane because I was the only freak who noticed!! People were using this bit of grammar distinction so frequently, I was beginning to think I had created this rule in my mind. But it's all good now. 

Ps. I should hope that the freaking dictionary gets it right...!</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=18683#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=18683#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>spacrDemon</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>venkat</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>We can use "that" only for "inanimate" objects and if anybody still doesn't considers himself/herself as a human can continue calling others THAT</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=17769#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=17769#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:36:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>venkat</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>ME</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>I think most people know that who is for people and that is for the things, the confusion comes from not knowing what, or who, is the subject of the sentence. For example in 'the woman that married my father' people (including me) confuse whether the sentence is about the woman, a who, or marriage, a that.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=17129#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=17129#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>ME</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>mnc</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>well, I was wondering about this because in French you use 'that' if the person is the direct object, and 'who' if the person is the subject.  So is it the same in English?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=16957#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=16957#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:20:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>mnc</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>Elizabeth</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>I noted you made a grammatical error in your explanation. In the sentence you wrote,"To me, using that when you are talking about a person makes THEM seem less than human." You should have said HE or SHE as the pronoun is referring a  singular noun, "a person."</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=16543#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=16543#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Elizabeth</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <author>Matthew</author>
      <category>grammar</category>
      <description>While I am normally a "Grammar Nazi," I very frequently use "that" in reference to a person. The reason is this: it is not uncommon in the slightest for other languages to use their equivalent of "that" for people. In Spanish, for example, they prefer to say "el hombre que vive aquí." "The man that lives here." They do not say "the man who lives here." I may be mistaken, but I believe it would actually be incorrect to say "who lives here" in that context (in Spanish).

So, I use them interchangeably for style and flow, as it is linguistically acceptable. :)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=16085#Comments</guid>
      <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx?commentid=16085#Comments</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Matthew</title>
    </item>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:53:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <link>http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx</link>
    <managingEditor>feedback@quickanddirtytips.com (Managing Editor)</managingEditor>
    <title>Who Versus That</title>
    <webMaster>feedback@quickanddirtytips.com (Webmaster)</webMaster>
    <language>en-us</language>
  </channel>
</rss>