Episode Transcript

Apostrophe Catastrophe (Part Two)
Episode 35: January 05, 2007

Grammar Girl here.

Today's topic is tough apostrophe issues.

Now, on to apostrophes.

I said it in the last episode about apostrophes, and I'll say it again: there are some confusing situations when it comes to apostrophes. For example, Christine, from Portland, Oregon; Judy from Traverse City, Michigan; Katy from Australia; Kristi from Washington, D.C.; and Rick from Las Vegas, Nevada, all asked how to make a singular word that ends in s possessive. I know that this is a raging debate even at the highest levels of government because Tracey from Mountain View, California, and a listener named Arman both sent me a funny article describing U.S. Supreme Court squabbles over making the word Kansas possessive. Words such as Kansas that end with an s can be stumpers when it comes to apostrophes.

Is it Kansas's statute with an apostrophe s or Kansas' statute with just an apostrophe at the end? Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion and prefers to leave off the extra s, referring to Kansas' statute with just an apostrophe at the end, whereas Justice David Souter wrote the dissenting opinion and prefers the double s of Kansas's statute with an apostrophe before the final s.

So who's right? The first clue is that Justice Thomas' name ends with an s, so you might guess that he is more familiar with the issue. Associated Press style also recommends leaving off the extra s. Some of you have noticed that I tend to favor AP style, so you won't be surprised to learn that I prefer to leave off the extra s. Unfortunately, I have to admit that this isn't a hard-and-fast rule; it's a style issue. Other style books such as Fowler's Modern English Usage recommend adding the apostrophe s to almost all singular words that end with s.*  So our first tough issue—how to make words that end with s possessive—doesn't actually have an answer; it's a style issue and you can do it either way.

I always feel bad when the answer is that there isn't an answer, so here's an easier situation that has a firm rule: if the word ending with s is plural, such as aardvarks, then you just add an apostrophe at the end to make it possessive. For example, you could write, "The aardvarks' escape route [s apostrophe] was blocked" to indicate that a family of aardvarks needed to find another way out of danger.

Plural words that don't end with s, such as children, do take an apostrophe s at the end for possession. For example, you could write, "Fortunately, the children's room [children apostrophe s] had a hidden doorway."

Here's a tricky issue with a definite answer: how do you make the plural of a single letter, as in Mind your p's and q's? It's shocking, but you actually use the apostrophe before the s! It looks possessive, but it isn't. The apostrophe is just there to make it clear that you're writing about multiple p's and q's. The apostrophe is especially important when you are writing about a's, i's, and u's because without the apostrophe readers could easily think you are writing the words as, is, and us.

Finally, we'll end with another gray area. Brian in Toronto and a listener named Josh asked whether they should use apostrophes to make abbreviations plural. Brian gets irritated when he sees signs advertising CD's for sale with it written C-D-apostrophe-s. Gen wrote in about the same thing, feeling a sense of horror after seeing CD's written with an apostrophe in the New York Times. Although I share Brian and Gen's irritation and hate seeing it written that way, again, I have to admit that it's a style issue, and some books recommend putting in the apostrophe because it indicates that letters are missing**. It makes me want to let out a big “Hrumph” like Sir Fragalot, but that's the way it is.

Believe it or not, there are even more issues we can talk about related to apostrophes, but I'm afraid I'm going to overwhelm everyone so I'll save them for another day.

That's all.

In the last episode I mentioned that I was thinking about doing a video podcast and there was a revolt! I've never received so much e-mail on one topic! Thank you so much for the input, and don't worry--I have no intention of abandoning the audio podcast. If I did video it would be a supplemental thing, and with all the comments I got encouraging me not to do it, it's a lot less likely to happen.

Thank you also to everyone who voted in the poll about the theme music. About 20 percent of you hate it, but 50 percent of you love it. I feel really bad about the people who hate it, but I don't think 20 percent is enough to justify changing the music. I'm afraid that if I change it, all that would happen is that a different 20 percent of you would hate it. But please do know that I gave your comments and votes serious consideration, and it really wasn't an easy decision to make.

So, the book giveaway winners this week are Liz, Jean A., Steve H., Warren from Newbury Park, California, and Kevin from Oakland, California. They all win a copy of Harry Shaw's book Punctuate It Right. Congratulations and please check your e-mail for instructions.

Thank you for listening. Please send questions and comments to feedback@quickanddirtytips.com, call them in to the voice-mail line at 206-338-GIRL (4475), or use the free MyChingo tool in the sidebar at the Grammar Girl website at QuickAndDirtyTips.com, where you'll also find a transcript of this podcast.


*The exceptions according to Fowler’s are words such as Moses and Bridges that end with an s that makes an /iz/ sound, classical names such as Zeus and Venus, and Jesus. Fowler's suggests that all of these words should end with just an apostrophe (e.g., Moses' tablets).

** Brian correctly pointed out that if you followed this logic, then you would need an apostrophe after every letter in an abbreviation (C'D's). I agree, but I don't write the books (yet).


Press

Grammar Girl has received a lot of press attention in the last week!

Grammar Girl was interviewed for an Associated Press story about bad grammar in song lyrics.
Grammar Girl was interviewed for the New Comm Road podcast. (Hear me ramble about how the show got started!)
The show was mentioned in Podcast User Magazine. (PDF file)
The show was recommended by the Arizona Republic.
The show was highlighted on the LifeHacker blog.

Comments (109) for Apostrophe Catastrophe (Part Two) |  Subscribe to Comment

Jeff Says:
5/1/2008 2:49:50 PM
How about this one - if you are talking about a final exam schedule, which would be correct "finals schedule" or finals' schedule"? Is it plural or possessive or both?
Kristin Says:
3/20/2008 1:12:37 AM
I hope people other than grammarians read your stuff, because my headache would dissipate considerably. Misuse of apostrophes and of homophones are my biggest grammar peeves. What's so sad is that these things are the *easier* grammar rules to follow, which tells me that people simply no longer care.
Kerry Says:
2/15/2008 5:47:01 PM
Apostrophes for possessives: For Proper Nouns ending in "s" - if it's a single syllable word, use 's, but if it's a multi-syllablic word, just add the '. Jesus' Odysseus' Chris's Ross's Kansas' The rule of thumb is to work out plural first, then possessive. The actresses' awards? The actress's award? This is such a fabulous site!
Kerry Says:
2/15/2008 5:43:39 PM
On "older" versus "elder" - when you have only two, the younger and the elder, use elder. When you have more than two, the younger, the older, the older, the older and the oldest, use older. That's what I was taught by my grammar nun.
Julie Says:
2/10/2008 12:13:29 AM
After reading the comments, am I right in assuming that I can say the Smiths without an apostrophe?
Grammar Girl Says:
8/22/2007 12:59:29 AM
For reasons that I've never understood, "Jesus" is an exception to the possessive rules. Even style guides that recommend using the second "s" if you pronounce it recommend leaving it off in the case of "Jesus."
CuriousBoy Says:
8/19/2007 5:00:59 PM
The pronunciation guideline makes a lot of sense to me. If the possessive of a word ending in "s" is pronounced as though the syllable "seas" is added to the end of it, then form the possessive by appending "'s" to the word: "boss's approval" is pronounced "boss-seas approval." However I disagree with one of the examples: "Jesus' parables." Wouldn't one pronounce that "Jesus-seas parables" so that it would be written as "Jesus's parables?" Consider a less lofty example: "Jesus's eyes." I would not pronounce that like "Jesus eyes;" I would pronounce it like "Jesus-seas eyes." Would I be wrong?
Grammar Girl Says:
8/12/2007 2:00:32 AM
In general you can't use apostrophes to make words plural, but there are a few exceptions (if you accept "New York Times" style or consider letters to be words).

There are some examples in the episode on this page. See the paragraphs about "CD's" and making letters plural.
dave Says:
8/11/2007 6:19:28 PM
I've been having a discussion with my 4th grade son about apostrophes and using them to make a word plural. I told him I don't believe you can. Are there every any cases where you can use an apostrophes to make a word plural and if so do you have some examples? Thanks
Inanimator Says:
7/19/2007 10:30:32 PM
This podcast reminds me of another issue which often comes up in my writing. Is it allowed to use the possessive form for inanimate objects? Often, I can avoid the inanimate possessive easily, but other times, I can't get rid of it without making the sentence clumsy. I think it's fine, but my friends disagree. Who's right? I would love to hear a podcast about this topic.
aardvark Says:
7/19/2007 2:56:49 AM
According to Punctuate It Right! p.43, Harry Shaw says to, "Use the apostrophe alone to form the possessive of a plural noun ending in s .

Two weeks' notice.

Hope this helps.
aardvark Says:
7/19/2007 2:50:08 AM
The word plaintiff is a noun defined as one who brings a law suit. You would not use it to describe a school district.
emily Says:
7/18/2007 3:08:35 PM
quick grammar issue.
"There are 236 plaintiffs school districts in CEE."

Is "plaintiff school districts" correct? That is what I'm tending towards, but wanted to know the rule.
Linda Says:
7/11/2007 1:42:20 PM
I am trying to find out the correct punctuation of the phrase, "two weeks notice." Does it get an apostrophe? I thought it was "two weeks' notice" because it is a possessive, but I've seen it as "two week's notice" and "two weeks notice". Help!
aardvark Says:
6/1/2007 12:22:12 AM
Hi Emily,

The first part of your question concerns making a Greek name plural. Patricia T. O’Conner says in her book, Woe Is I, to add es to names ending in the letter s. (p.21). Signing your Christmas cards, The Metropolises, makes good sense and soothes the ear, as well.


The second part of your question concerns using apostrophes to show possession. Good news! In his book, Punctuate It Right!, Harry Shaw uses two Greek multi-syllabic names to illustrate his point.

He says, “ In words of more than one syllable ending in s or s sound, add an apostrophe only: Themistocles’ strategy, Aristophanes’ plays, Berlioz’ compositions.” (p.43)

So, if you were planning to invite aardvark to your summer home, you would send him an invitation requesting the pleasure of his company at the Metropolis’ summer home.

Hope this helps.
Emily Says:
5/31/2007 4:01:50 PM
Years ago I was trying to save time while helping my mom write out family Christmas cards by signing our last name (plural) alone instead of The (our name) Family. She wouldn't let me continue because we didn't know how to make it plural. It's a Greek last name that ends in "is" like the Greek word metropolis. Instead of the last name Richards where the final letter s is vocal (pronounced like a z, not an s), our last name would require the added z sound after the final s sound. So if Metropolis were a Greek last name, and I wanted to sign a card with something that would be read The Metropolis-iz, how would I do that? Is it just The Metropolis'? And in that case, is the plural the Metropolis's summer home, for example?
Tom Says:
5/9/2007 10:51:48 PM
Have you noticed the poster for The Robinsons (no relation ;-)

It has: wait 'til you meet the family of the future.

(Till or until of course being the correct form.)

http://www.apple.com/trailers/disney/meettherobinsons/
Tom Says:
5/9/2007 10:47:55 PM
(Unless GG corrects me!) Your son 'owns' the return, so yes, it's: my son's return.

If you were waiting for two (or more) sons, it would be: my sons' return.
HEATHER Says:
5/8/2007 9:44:27 PM
My question is reagarding the following: I am waiting for my son's return.

I am only referring to 1 son. Do I need the apostrophe?
Kevin Says:
5/2/2007 3:09:21 PM
Is this correct? I've searched all over the internet for references on this topic, but cannot find the answer anywhere. My problem is that I don't know if it should be Schmitz' pencil or Schmitz's pencil. According to Linfs, I would use the former. Thanks!
Grammar Girl Says:
4/30/2007 4:49:09 AM
I've looked this up in a bunch of different places. I found conflicting answering, none of which seemed definitively convincing.

I prefer "doctor appointment" because it makes more sense to me (it's my appointment with the doctor, so doctor is modifying appointment), but "doctor's appointment" seems to be more common.

Sorry I can't be more helpful!
Steve Says:
4/19/2007 2:28:15 AM
It would be "37 years' experience", and you can tell by comparing the singular forms: "One year of experience" vs. "One year's experience."
Christy Says:
4/15/2007 4:28:50 PM
What about a doctor's appointment. Is that correct? Does the doctor own the appointment?
Nick Says:
4/13/2007 11:53:10 PM
One of my co-workers is writing an evaluation for a program she is conducting later this month. One of the statements states,"I know more about SCC services, procedures and programs then I did before attending the event."

SCC is the location (College in this case) need a possesive apostrophe?
Linda Says:
4/7/2007 6:37:04 PM
Y'all: Short for you all; you all need to get to the meeting. You all's meeting is running late. Ergo, y'all's. Of course it should actually be "your meeting," but I tried...
Linda Says:
4/7/2007 5:28:07 PM
Grammar Girl, This had two separate parts of a question. I believe you answered the first part, but not the second.
Linda Says:
4/7/2007 5:22:16 PM
It would be "37 years experience OR 37 years of experience." There is no apostrophe because "years" is plural, not possessive. You are not putting an apostrophe because the "of" is missing. With or without the "of" is correct.
Linda Says:
4/7/2007 4:59:16 PM
Actually I believe it was the party that people were being invited to and not their birthdays (as they were on separate days) so it should be "Bill Packer & Len Winston's 40th birthday party."
Linda Says:
4/7/2007 4:52:49 PM
That's exactly what she was addressing on Ophra. It was most interesting.
Linda S. Says:
4/7/2007 1:08:06 PM
Can someone comment on the apostrophe use for a last name ending in a double s? I inherited the name through marriage and never feel as though I'm writing the plural form correctly. On an invitation, is our party at the Chambliss' or the Chambliss's or the Chamblisses? When signing a greeting from all of us, are we the Chambliss', the Chambliss's or the Chamblisses? I try to follow what others do, but I see it so many ways, I don't know which is correct!
Grammar Girl Says:
4/4/2007 3:59:34 PM
"O'Brien's" looks strange, but it is correct!
Patricia Gill Says:
4/4/2007 2:14:12 PM
I appreciate your clarifying the use of apostrophes. I was wondering if there is a rule about a word containing more than one? If the car belongs to O'Brien is it O'Brien's car? It looks so strange to me. Thanks!
Grammar Girl Says:
4/2/2007 5:04:27 AM
If two people share something you only put the apostrophe "s" after the last name (John and Susie's dog), but if you are talking about separate things that they don't share, then each name gets an apostrophe "s" (John's and Susie's dogs).
Megan Says:
4/2/2007 3:21:45 AM
Grammar Girl, After listening to both apostrophe pod casts, I was left wondering about multiple subjects. When I write: John's and Susie's dog was barking, do I put an apostrophe s after each name because the dog belongs to both John and Susie, or do I simply put it after Susie? I've seen it both ways, but I seem to remember my junior high English teacher telling the class to put an apostrophe s after both owners. Thanks for the help!
Catherine H. Says:
4/1/2007 7:40:18 PM
I have an argument for adding an apostrophe+s to the ends of singular nouns that end in s.

Controversy: Thomas's book or Thomas' book?

I'm a proponent of the form "Thomas's" mainly because I find the other form visually distracting: in a flicker of a moment, I think that Thomas is plural -- but there is only one Thomas, not many Thomases. This may sound petty, but it actually distracts me a lot. Also, while "children's" might appear very briefly to be singular, the whole noun "children" is so recognizably plural that I don't find myself thinking that stuff like "children" is singular.

Interestingly, the only place I am happy with the other form (singular s-final noun followed by just an apostrophe and no additional s) is in the word Jesus'. I actually saw in a style guide that Jesus' was the only place it was okay to "violate" this rule I believe so strongly in, probably due to popular convention. I believe it only because I actually hear people say "Jesus" in church the same phonetic way they say "Jesus'." E.g., "In Jesus' name we pray." (Oh, God, what a mess of punctuation marks I've just made.) In other places, people will actually pronounce the two s's at the end of "Thomas's" (ta-mus-ez).

Wow, "E.g." looks awkward. I had originally left it uncapitalized, and then I changed it since it was the beginning of a sentence. Rawrrrr, I hope that's correct.
Jen Says:
3/30/2007 6:05:53 PM
It has! Thanks again ...
aardvark Says:
3/29/2007 6:03:40 PM
Again, in Harry Shaw's Punctuate It Right! (p.43), he offers this advice:

"In one syllable proper names ending in s or an s sound add an apostrophe and s."

Jan Szucs's 40th birthday.

If your last name were multi-syllabic and ended with an "s" or "s" sound, you would put the apostrophe after the final "s" in your last name.

Jan Superszucs' 40th birthday.

Hope this helps.
Jan Says:
3/29/2007 5:16:42 PM
Thanks for your help - one more question:

Where does the apostrophe can with a name like mine? Szucs ... one of those s things!

You are invited to celebrate Bill Packer's & Jan Szucs's 40th birthdays!

or

You are invited to celebrate Bill Packer's & Jan Szucs' 40th birthdays!

I'd like to get this right ...

Thanks again.
Jan Says:
3/29/2007 5:16:42 PM
Punctuate It Right! (p.43) says,"Use an apostrophe with each element in a series to indicate alternative or individual possession." This means that when the items have individual possession, such as the birthdays to which you refer, you will need an apostrophe for each man's name because each man has his own special day.

Squiggly's and aardvark's birthdays will be celebrated later this year. Grammar Girl will not reveal their ages!
Grammar Girl Says:
3/29/2007 3:43:35 PM
The party is shared and the birthdays are not. So depending on how you word the invitation, you could write it two different ways:

"You are invited to celebrate Bill's and Len's birthdays."

"You are invited to Bill and Len's 40th birthday party."
Jan Says:
3/29/2007 1:05:06 PM
I have a question I would like help to answer. My husband and his friend have birthdays one day apart. We are having a party for them - so how should this go on the invitation? You are invited to Bill Packer & Len Winston's 40th birthdays? Or Bill Packer's & Len Winston's 40th birthdays? Thanks.
Grammar Girl Says:
3/28/2007 4:59:24 PM
You can use bad as an adverb when it follows a linking verb such as feel, smell, and taste. So it is correct to say, "The children behaved badly," but it is also correct to say, "I feel bad." I covered this in more detail in the episode titled Bad Versus Badly.
Linda Says:
3/27/2007 8:15:24 PM
Why would she be behind it when she said she would say Arkansas' vice Arkansas's? Did I miss something?
gitmofish@aol.com Says:
3/27/2007 8:12:58 PM
Girl, Saw you existed on Oprah today. So glad to find you!!! Apostrophes are my pet peeve. I do not feel it's a "style issue" whether or not to use apostrophe s or just an apostrophe after a name ending in s as much as it is a lack of education. People don't know any better any more, including the younger teachers, so they don't teach it. I have noticed in some of the elementary English books where the s' is not even taught any more. I would guess that Fowler, in Fowler's Modern English Usage, is younger also. As my maiden name was Sanders, I paid a great deal of attention to the s' that was used with my name, unlike most others’ names. When my own children went to elementary school, I spoke with each of their teachers before the lessons on showing possession, to be sure my child would not be counted wrong when using s' vice s's, because s's was what was going to be taught, but my children would not be using it.

What I did not see addressed was what to do when the word ended in a Z. That's not even addressed in English books anymore. A z is treated the same as an s (Mr. Rodriquez' watch, Mrs. Sanchez' necklace, the Melendez’ parents).

News announcers drive me crazy adding es (phonetically) to every name ending in s now. They are supposed to be setting examples and yet are showing their ignorance instead. You never used to hear that used. Arkansas? Oh my goodness, talk about their English going downhill. Like I said, apostrophes are my pet peeve.
Nancy Says:
3/27/2007 2:19:49 AM
On 1/4/07 you wrote, "I always feel bad." I have been under the impression that "badly" is correct. Please clarify. I saw you on Oprah! Good for you! How about "whether or not" and "if?" I was taught that just writing "whether" is incorrect. Thanks, Nancy
John Says:
3/19/2007 4:01:51 PM
We have clarity on the possessive of Arkansas's!
AR House Passes Bill Declaring "Arkansas's" The Correct Possessive Form Of The State's Name

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7006658673

I have no proof, bu I think that Grammar Girl was behind this.
Helmut Oesterling Says:
3/14/2007 11:54:57 PM
Great website. Keep the Audio please. And don't change it! It's perfect! I find it extremely helpful. You make a great teacher.

Helmut
Anne Says:
3/9/2007 8:49:18 PM
I'm pretty sure there is an apostrophe. My understanding is that it is effectively "37 years of experience," so when you cut out the "of," you use an apostrophe. I choose to think of those years owning the experience that they provided, and that helps me remember.
Susan Says:
3/9/2007 7:39:01 PM
What a great site! Here's another apostrophe puzzle. In the phrase, "She has 37 years(') experience...," is there an apostrophe or not? Why?
Grammar Girl Says:
3/3/2007 9:48:08 PM
(James' mom) just sent me a link to this great story about Arkansas debating whether to add a final "s" when making their state name possessive.
Chris Says:
3/2/2007 12:35:17 AM
Hi Grammar Girl - Just recently found your site and enjoy downloading podcasts and listening to your tips--good stuff. I was recently listening to your July '06 explanations re: "i.e." vs. "e.g." I must say, at the risk of sounding scathing, that your pronunciation of "etc." is wrong, s