Episode Transcript

Comparatives Versus Superlatives
Episode 125: August 12, 2008

Grammar Girl here.

Your hostess with the mostest, guest-writer Bonnie Trenga, is back for more on comparisons.

In a previous show, we talked about when to use “more” and “most” or the suffixes “-er” and “-est” to make comparisons using adjectives and adverbs. In this show, we’ll go a little bit more in depth about comparisons.

Comparatives vs. Superlatives

When you’re comparing items, you need to notice if you’re comparing two things or more than two things.

When you compare two items, you’re using what’s called a comparative, so you use “more” before the adjective or the suffix “-er” on the end of it. You can remember that comparatives are for two thing because “comparative” has the sound “pair” in it and a pair is always two things. It's not spelled like “pair” but it sounds like pair.

When you compare three or more items, you’re using a superlative, so you use “most” or the suffix “-est.” You can remember that superlatives are for more than two things because “superlative” has the word “super” in it and when you want a whole bunch of something, you supersize it.

So to think about it loosely, use a comparative when you have a pair of things and a superlative when you have a supersized group (at least more than two).

Now, if you listened to the other show about comparisons, you know when you’re supposed to use which one.* If not, you can always check it out; it's episode 124.

Here's how you would use comparisons and superlatives. If you want to brag that you now have more knowledge about grammar than you used to, you’re comparing now and then, which is two items. You might therefore state, “I’ve been listening to Grammar Girl for a while, so my grammar is better than it used to be.” Here, the comparative is “better.” If, on the other hand, you’re comparing yourself with your six cousins, you’re comparing seven people. You might say, “I am the best speller in the family.” Here, the superlative is “best.”

Errors Versus Broken Rules

A few errors crop up with comparisons. One common mistake is using a superlative form when you’re comparing only two items. For example, it would be incorrect to say, “It was the tallest of the two buildings.” You are comparing just two buildings, so you should use a comparative, “taller,” not a superlative, “tallest.” A quick and dirty tip to help you remember which suffix goes with which number of items is that “-er” has two letters, and it is for comparing two things; “-est” has three letters, and it is for comparing three or more things.

Sometimes, though, an error of this kind sounds more natural than the grammatically correct version. Take this sentence: “Which house of Congress has the better attendance record?” That technically correct sentence sounds odd to me. I’m not sure why, but I would prefer to say, “best attendance record” even though there are only two houses of Congress (1). Perhaps it’s because “best” is becoming more common than “better.” You’ll hear, and probably say, “Put your best foot forward.” Of course we have only two feet, so we should really say “better foot,” but that sounds very strange. Maybe we say “best” because we are speaking figuratively, as in “Do the best you can”; we’re not really talking about actual feet. But we also say, “May the best team win,” usually when only two teams are playing.

So “better” versus “best” is a bit of a conundrum. Sometimes the ungrammatical way sounds best. And again, I just caught myself using “best” instead of “better” in that sentence. I compared two items, the grammatical way and the ungrammatical way, but I used a superlative. Well, I guess “best” is sometimes the best option, even if it’s not technically correct. In speech, it’s probably fine to let a few “bests” slip out, but in formal writing you might want to use a comparative when it’s called for. If it sounds unnatural, then rewrite the sentence.

Empty Comparisons

Another error I encounter a lot is what I call an empty comparison, a comparison that doesn’t state explicitly what is being compared. For instance, an advertisement that says, “This hard drive is better and faster,” fails to state what is worse and slower. When readers see empty comparisons, they have to guess what the writer means. In this case, I might guess that the ad is promoting a hard drive that is better and faster than a competing model, or perhaps it means better and faster than the previous version of this brand of hard drive. Readers don’t like being in the dark, so be sure to include the other half of your comparison when you use a comparative.

That’s about it as far as comparisons go.

Administrative

This show was written by Bonnie Trenga, author of The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier, who blogs at http://sentencesleuth.blogspot.com.

You can reach me, Grammar Girl, at quickanddirtytips.com, where you'll also find a complete transcript of this podcast. Thanks for listening.

*Here’s a quick review: One-syllable adjectives use the suffixes “-er” or “-est” on the end of the adjective. Adjectives with three or more syllables use “more” or “most” in front of the adjective. Adjectives with two syllables have different rules. Sometimes you have to use the suffixes, other times you have to use “more” or “most,” and in some cases you can use either. You’ll need to rely on your ear and your dictionary to determine which one is correct.

Reference

1. American Heritage Guide to Contemporary Usage and Style. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005, p. 57.


Comments (10) for Comparatives Versus Superlatives |  Subscribe to Comment

The Dangling Modifier Says:
11/3/2009 3:15:45 PM
This is great - but how about the new and exciting comparative adverb? Isn't it better to say that "The boy ran quickerly than his friend", for example, than "The boy ran more quickly"? I have written expansiverly on this here: http://thedanglingmodifier.co.uk/
Dawn Says:
8/3/2009 1:20:07 PM
Would putting two superlatives together be incorrect. To me it sounds incorrect. Example: It is the most easiest thing. Easiest implies that it is already the most so MOST isn't need and sounds improper.
Allan Schultz Says:
5/20/2009 7:55:08 PM
If two in a group are equal and better that all others, can either claim to be "the best"? e.g., if heights are a=5 feet, b=5.25 feet, c=5.5 feet, d= six feet, and e= six feet, is it legitimate for d to claim "I am the tallest in the group", and likewise for e? Thanks.
Maryan Pelland Says:
5/2/2009 11:09:53 AM
Great column - and really worth thinking about. Have you talked about forming comparatives properly? My pet peeve - news anchors drive me nutz with "more smart than"! see this short article http://tinyurl.com/c37flt mkp www.ontext.com
Dee Says:
11/13/2008 3:30:27 PM
Doesn't the use of "than" negate the use of a superlative? "He practiced more diligently than all the other athletes." Please help.
Kathy Says:
9/4/2008 5:26:47 PM
Questions: What is the correct verb to use in the following sentence, "is" or "are"? Should I use the word "more" or "most" in the following sentence? Sentence: The most important of these factors is a, b, and c.
Ben Says:
8/13/2008 1:25:19 AM
Re: "...best foot forward..." I've never considered this expression to mean "best of your two feet forward", but rather considered it a figurative foot. I envision it to mean that you shouldn't put your groggy Monday-morning foot forward, or your lazy Saturday-morning foot, but rather to put your well-rested, Sunday-morning, church-going foot forward. Does that make sense? In this regard, "best" fits the rules better than "better" does. :)
Philipp Says:
8/12/2008 8:38:53 PM
@Isabella: no you are absolutely right. :)
Isela Says:
8/12/2008 7:25:18 PM
Using worse and worst correctly... incorrect: Alfonso's eye got worst over the weekend. Correct: Alfonso's eye got worse over the weekend. Am I wrong?
Philipp Says:
8/12/2008 6:43:46 AM
I just heard this episode and wanted to let you in on something my Latin teacher taught me. He said that a superlative is an absolute. That means unless you qualify it somehow best means the absolute best ever. So you say "put the best foot forward" not because you should put the better of your two feet forward but because you should choose the best. That means even if you magically turned into a spider with eight feet the saying would still hold true. The way I remember this is by inserting "and all potential" mentally. I would say "You should the best foot (of the ones I have and all potential ones) forward". From that point forward your rules apply in terms of the number of things applies. Thanks for a wonderful podcast. Best regards, Philipp

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required