Episode Transcript

Good Versus Well
Episode 51: April 20, 2007

Grammar Girl here.

Today's topic is well versus good.

It's such a simple little question: How are you? But I've heard from people who feel a twinge of trepidation or even full-blown frustration every time they have to decide whether to say they're good or they're well.

“I'm good” is what you're likely to hear in general conversation, but there are grammar nitpickers out there who will chide you if you say it. The wonderful news is that those nitpickers are wrong: it's perfectly acceptable to say, “I'm good,” and you shouldn't have to shamefully submit to teasing remarks such as the time-honored and leering, “How good are you?”

The nitpickers will tell you that well is an adverb (and therefore modifies verbs) and that good is an adjective (and therefore modifies nouns), but the situation isn't that simple.

The key is to understand how linking verbs differ from action verbs. (Trust me, this is worth it so you can look people in the eye and say, “I'm good,” with absolute confidence.)

First, let's talk about action verbs. They're easy; they describe actions. Verbs such as run, jump, and swim are all action verbs. If you want to describe an action verb, you use an adverb like well. You could say: He runs well; she jumps well; they swim well. Well is an adverb that relates to all those action verbs.

Linking verbs, on the other hand, are a little bit more complicated. Linking verbs aren't about actions as much as they are about connecting other words together (1, 2). They're also sometimes called “copulative verbs.”

I think of the verb to be as the quintessential linking verb. The word is is a form of the verb to be, and if I say, He is yellow, the main purpose of is is really just to link the word he with the word yellow. Other linking verbs include seem, appear, look, become, and verbs that describe senses, such as feel and smell. That isn't a comprehensive list of linking verbs—there are at least 60 in the English language (1)—but I hope that will give you an idea of how they work.

One complication is that some verbs—such as the sensing verbs—can be both linking verbs and action verbs (2, 3). A trick that will help you figure out if you're dealing with a linking verb is to see if you can replace the verb with a form of to be; if so, then it's probably a linking verb (1, 4). For example, you can deduce that feel is a linking verb in the sentence He feels bad because if you replace feels with the word is, the sentence still makes sense: He is bad. On the other hand, if you have a sentence such as He feels badly, and you replace feels with is, it doesn't make sense anymore: He is badly. So in that case you know that feel is functioning as an action verb.

OK, so now you understand the difference between linking verbs and action verbs. That might seem like a detour on the way to learning why it is OK to say, "I'm good," but it's important because the thing people seem to forget is that it's standard to use adjectives—such as good—after linking verbs (5, 6). When you do it, they are called predicate adjectives, and they refer back to the noun before the linking verb. That's why, even though good is primarily an adjective, it is OK to say, "I am good": am is a linking verb, and you use adjectives after linking verbs.

Aside from the linking-verb-action-verb trickiness, another reason people get confused about this topic is that well can be both an adverb and a predicate adjective. As I said earlier, in the sentence He swam well, well is an adverb that describes how he swam. But when you say, “I am well,” you're using well as a predicate adjective. That's fine, but most sources say well is reserved to mean “healthy” when it's used in this way (1, 3, 4). So if you are recovering from a long illness and someone is inquiring about your health, it's appropriate to say, “I am well,” but if you're just describing yourself on a generally good day and nobody's asking specifically about your health, a more appropriate response is, “I am good.”

Finally, it's very important to remember that it's wrong to use good as an adverb after an action verb. For example, it's wrong to say, “He swam good.” Cringe! The proper sentence is He swam well, because swam is an action verb and it needs an adverb to describe it. Remember, you can only use adjectives such as good and bad after linking verbs, you can't use them after action verbs.

That's all.

I'm really excited about this week's book giveaway because it's a signed book that you can't get anywhere else. One of my favorite podcasts is called Short Cummings Audio. It's a short humor essay that is read each week by the author, Kevin Cummings. I've been corresponding with Kevin for a few months, and I recently convinced him to put together a book of his essays for me to give away on the show. The three winners of this very special book are Angela, Nicholas, and John. For everyone else, I encourage you to check out his podcast, Short Cummings Audio. It's free at iTunes or his website, shortcummingsaudio.com.

Regarding my audiobook, it just came to my attention that there isn't a table of contents available at iTunes or Audible.com. The book is divided into tracks, but that obviously doesn't help you much if you can't see what those tracks are! So I've put a table of contents with timepoints on the website. Now if you click on the big “buy the audiobook” banner at the top of the site, you'll go to a page that has the table of contents and links to sites where you can buy the book. I hope that helps.

Questions and comments for me, Grammar Girl, go to feedback@quickanddirtytips.com or the voice-mail line at 206-338-GIRL (4475). You can find a full transcript of this podcast at quickanddirtytips.com, where you can also find other great podcasts, like Modern Manners, Legal Lad, and The Mighty Mommy. Finally, don't forget to sign up for the free newsletter—you'll get an extra grammar tip every week or two.

References

  1. Morris, M. and Morris, W. Harper Dictionary of Contemporary English Usage. New York: Harper & Rowe, 1995, p. 359.
  2. Lynch, J. "Linking Verbs." The Lynch Guide to Grammar. andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/l.html(accessed April 20, 2007)
  3. Anson, C. M., Schwegler, R. A., and Muth, M. F. The Longman Pocket Writer's Companion. Second edition. New York: Pearson Education, 2006, p. 157.
  4. Brockenbrough, M. "Martha Talks Back." Encarta, http://urltea.com/1eem (accessed April 20, 2007)
  5. Thurman, S., The Only Grammar Book You'll Ever Need. Avon: Adams Media, 2003, p. 41.
  6. Scharton, M. and Neuleib, J. Things Your Grammar Never Told You. Second edition. New York: Pearson Education, 2001, p. 37.

    Additional Sources

Comments (63) for Good Versus Well |  Subscribe to Comment

holly Says:
6/26/2009 12:24:10 AM
to the proponents of using solely "well": how can the negative/honest/pessimistic person reply? "i an not well" seems to grate, on my ears at least. how does "alright/ok" fit in? if someone asks, "how's the cake?", can you say "it's good" without implying that it's very virtuous cake? please pardon the punctuation.
John from Lorain Says:
6/20/2009 11:03:06 AM
You too are correct, Yasi.
John from Lorain Says:
6/20/2009 10:59:15 AM
This comment is two years late, but "better late than never." Paul, you were right, and Grammar Gril was (pathetically) wrong. As you stated, Paul, it is NEVER proper to answer, "I am good," to the question, "How are you?" One may answer, "I am well" or "I am fine" or "I feel poorly," etc., but never "I am good" (which means, as you stated, Paul, "I am virtuous"). The problem is this: Here and there, in our nation, an influential individual misuses a word by trying to give it a new meaning (e.g., misuses "good" to mean "well"). Then, a few spineless people who admire the individual begin to imitate him/her. Then, before you know it, someone who has a captive audience (like GG), is pontificating about the subject and demanding that everyone believe that it's OK to misuse the word, "good." It's just pitiful the way the language deteriorates because of these misguided souls!
Yasi Says:
6/17/2009 11:22:33 AM
Thank you SJ, for catching my typo. I must have gotten ahead of myself thinking of my next sentence. But just so you know, I committed a grammatical error, not a spelling one. And I was not trying to "bash" her advice; I was trying to correct her so that others may learn.
SJ Says:
6/11/2009 10:05:38 AM
Yasi Says: 5/22/2009 9:13:32 PM .... First of all, she are wrong in saying ... -------- Yasi - get your spelling right before you start bashing someone's advice on grammar.
Yasi Says:
5/22/2009 9:13:32 PM
Grammar Girl is wrong, and there are a few reasons why this argument is fallacious. First of all, she are wrong in saying that when people ask you "How are you?" or "How are you doing?" that they are not inquiring about your health. Actually, they are. That question is inherently an inquiry about health, whether it is explicit or not. It is NOT asking how you are feeling; the two do not mean the same thing. Grammar Girl is perfectly correct in saying that you can be feeling good (in good spirits), but that is not the answer to the question. That is the answer to "How are you feeling?" which means something else. Secondly, Grammar Girl relies heavily on a non sequitur when she talks about using good as a predicate adjective. Yes, you CAN use good as a predicate adjective, but that is when the meaning of "I am good" is "I am a good person." The two meanings are different. When someone asks you how you are, he/she is NOT asking you what kind of a person you are. "I am good" has a different meaning in this case. Grammar Girl also says that because "to be" is a linking verb, and you can use predicate adjectives with linking verbs, then "I am good" is correct (going back to the "to be in good spirits" argument as well). This is where the non sequitur comes in; "to be" does not mean the same thing as "to feel." Just because they are both linking verbs, they are not interchangeable. "Run" and "swim" are both action verbs, but you wouldn't use them interchangeably. "Chair" and "child" are both concrete nouns, but they do not mean the same thing. So just because "to be" is a linking verb, you can not use it to mean the same thing as "to feel" and you can not equate the question "How do you feel?" with "How are you?".
Ramesan. P, Kerala Says:
5/15/2009 4:58:29 AM
Most people do not know that there is a class of verb called " Linking verb or Copulative verb".You have explained the term so simply that even a beginner can easily understand the term.I've often seen students wondering what actually is the use of "am" or "is" in a sentence.'Wordwala'has now offered a solution for their problem. Thank you.
MarketingMark Says:
4/30/2009 9:49:38 AM
Please help. What is the correct way of writing or saying: How to write better or How to write well I often get corrected off people when I say I want to write better they say "No, you would like to write well" Thanks
Justin R Says:
4/23/2009 10:41:30 PM
Wait! I am incorrect! "To be," in this case, IS considered to be primarily a linking verb and not an action verb (used in context, at least). I have no words.
Justin R Says:
4/23/2009 10:22:09 PM
This poses an interesting argument; I never actually considered that when predicate adjectives are used in writing, they are considered to be predicate adjectives simply because they are used in conjuction with a form of the verb "to be." However, as it relates to this particular argument, the discussion on "action verbs" seems unnecessary; the situation in question doesn't deal with an action verb but rather a linking verb only. Also, just a thought: Isn't the verb "to be" an action verb? Be is the action. I can understand where it may function as a linking verb as well, but it seems to me as if because of its very nature it is an action verb. In that case, would it not be incorrect to structure a sentence with, for example, I (form of "to be") good? Like, let's say, the sentence read "We are good." Good is more of an adjective in its common form than a state of being, in my opinion. Although I am not arguing that there is no situation in which "I am good" could be used correctly, I am arguing that it is more commonly accepted to say "I am well." Again, this is just my thoughts; I'm not at all an expert at this :-).
Phlup Says:
4/16/2009 8:50:49 AM
Good vs. well: No matter how confidently -- and correctly -- you state "I'm good," there will be those swallow a smirk and believe you have it wrong. It's ambiguous, particularly in response to "How are you doing?" The response "I'm fine" is only slightly less ambiguous ("Oh, yeah? Just how fine are you?") but, perhaps because it's in relatively limited circulation, is less likely to be seized upon by the questioning grammar snob as a mistake. BTW, it's a bit of a stretch, but I would contend it's possible to feel badly -- a person with poor tactile sense could be said to do so (particularly after burning his or her flesh on a hot stove), and so could someone who isn't in touch with his or her emotions.
Ginger Says:
4/7/2009 1:20:59 PM
Help! Every morning my husband asks our baby, "Did you sleep good?" I correct him to say, "Did you sleep well?" Can you help me explain to him why it's well and not good?
demmy Says:
3/20/2009 8:29:26 AM
how can l get big grammer testbook
Susan Says:
3/19/2009 9:47:25 PM
Thank you for this posting, which I found by searching "grammar 'is good' 'is well'". It was just what I needed! It's possible that our sense of the correct reply may be culturally based. Some groups of people really do mean to imply "How is your health?" when they ask "How are you?" while others mean to imply "How are you doing?" This raises another question. What about the reply "I'm doing good" vs. "I'm doing well" to the question "How are you?" I assume the correct reply is "I'm doing well" unless you are actively engaged in a Random Act of Kindness. But I am curious about your response.
Kal Says:
2/27/2009 1:22:43 PM
Hi Grammar Girl. Thanks for a great post! My question: What is the correct response to "How are you doing?"? Is it: "I am doing well" or "I am doing good"? Thanks and Keep up the great work!
Bernadette Says:
2/19/2009 7:57:12 AM
I disagree. The issue of 'good' versus 'well' is one of semantics. Generally when someone asks 'How are you?' it IS an inquiry into their state of health. As GG indicates, in that case the response should be "I am well".
Brittania Says:
2/17/2009 10:49:36 PM
How about fine? Is it proper to say I am fine?
Victor from Cincy,OH Says:
2/17/2009 3:04:48 PM
Cautiously, he tasted the food. cautiously modifies 'tasted' because tasted=action verb The food tasted yummy. (not 'yummily', if that’s even a word lol) b.c. the verb of the sentence in this case is a linking verb. Likewise, if someone asked you how you were doing (not referring to your health, but just like "Hey, what’s up?") a grammatically correct answer that states what you mean to convey would be "I feel good." (NOT "I feel well.") "The bookcase feels bumpy." uses the correct form also, since you could just as well/easily (though less-descriptively say "The bookcase *is* bumpy>"(<<nice trick, btw!") "She feels/is passionate about this project" ('passionately is'??!?) On the other hand, one using correct form would say .. *trying to think of how 'to feel' could be used in an active sense* . . He felt the bed sheets quickly. (alright a pretty contrived sentence I concede, but the point being is that no-one with half a brain would say "He_was_the bed sheets quickly.")
Victor Says:
2/17/2009 2:54:35 PM
Errr,edit: he claimed that use of 'good' to modify 'feel' was wrong (delusionally).
Victor from Cincy,OH Says:
2/17/2009 2:51:00 PM
My grammar-ignorant 'Creative Writing' teacher, Mr. Haap, made a point in class today to profess how our use of 'well' as to modify the verb 'feel' is wrong and more-or-less that it’s primarily (lol) James Brown's fault (with his 'I Feel Good' song) for ingraining this construct into our minds. Ignoramus, 'good' doesn't modify 'feel' in this sense; it refers back to the subject (I). He failed to see the light.
bane Says:
2/13/2009 7:31:26 AM
the question is if 'i am good' is correct. it is, but that doesn't imply that 'i am well' is incorrect, they just convey different messages. grammar girl explained it perfectly, did not make a single mistake, so i don't understand paul's desire to oppose. 'i am good' doesn't only mean 'i am virtuous' and it is a good response to 'how are you', unless you are actually being asked about your health. it is a question of grammar, as well as semantics. grammar girl only explained it from a grammatical point of view, and was completely on spot.
bane Says:
2/13/2009 6:48:24 AM
the question is if 'i am good' is correct. it is, but that doesn't imply that 'i am well' is incorrect, they just convey different messages. grammar girl explained it perfectly, did not make a single mistake, so i don't understand paul's desire to oppose. 'i am good' doesn't only mean 'i am virtuous' and it is a good response to 'how are you', unless you are actually being asked about your health. it is a question of grammar, as well as semantics. grammar girl only explained it from a grammatical point of view, and was completely on spot.
Richard Says:
1/28/2009 2:05:08 AM
My goodness! What an amazing article! You really know your stuff well :) Sorry, I couldn't resist using my new found knowledge. I really appreciate this posting. Thank you so much!
great Says:
1/5/2009 7:46:04 PM
I don't know if any of you are Dave Ramsey fans but his standard answer to "How are you?" is "Better than I deserve!"
jolie Says:
9/12/2008 1:44:15 PM
if i asked someone "how are you?" and they responded with "i am well," i'd think that was a polite way of saying, "at least i've got my health..." however, if someone says "i am good," it suggests a general state of being that's not just limited to health.
kent Says:
9/9/2008 10:50:22 AM
wow!!! this website helps me a lot!!! my english teacher loves it n highly reccommends it. this thing has every answer in the book.i Love wisconsin
Araceli Says:
4/9/2008 5:35:46 PM
are linking verbs also called "stative verbs"?
Ronald Quezada Says:
4/7/2008 11:19:32 AM
Is there such a thing as an epicene pronoun ?
dan Says:
3/8/2008 8:15:39 PM
when I'm ask "how are you" my general answer is "I'm fine, thanks for asking" then I return the with the question "how are you"..
ashley Says:
2/21/2008 12:48:57 PM
Question: Which is correct? I feel good about my novel. OR I feel well about my novel. Well seems to be answering HOW I feel, but good seems to describe the feeling I have.
Ale Says:
12/6/2007 10:31:00 AM
I am an education major at Bluefield State College in West Virginia. I used this article as a reference for a paper I was writing for my Grammar class. My professor LOVED my work, and is now hooked on reading the Grammar Girl 'blogs'. Keep them coming :)
Melanie M. Says:
11/15/2007 12:24:12 AM
Thank You! This cleared up a lot!
Says:
9/27/2007 7:14:45 AM
Thanks,Grammar Girl! People are just nit picking your podcast. The nest time someone asks "How are you?", I will answer "Super, thanks for asking."!
CuriousBoy Says:
8/23/2007 2:09:21 AM
RE: I recently convinced [Kevin]... My comment isn't about a grammar issue, but "persuaded" would have been more appropriate than "convinced." Some might even say "convinced" is the wrong word choice. Re: ----- --------
Peter Says:
7/25/2007 5:28:46 PM
You mentioned is your podcast "good" versus "well" that there was a chart that could be printed out. Where can I find this char? Thank you, Peter -----
aardvark Says:
5/31/2007 2:31:25 PM
Your questions are very good. The general rule for the use of commas in modifying adjectives is to use commas between adjectives that are coordinate. Coordinate generally means "of equal rank." One way to test if adjectives are coordinate is to insert the word and between the adjectives. This rule will explain why no comma was inserted between "aggressive" and "new." They are not coordinate. This rule will also explain why a comma was inserted between "sweet" and "funny" and "smart" and "curious". They are coordinate. In general it is safe to omit commas after numbers and adjectives of shape, age, and size. Example: The big old dog scared small aardvark. Your second question concerns using the word "best" as an adverb. The answer to the question is to say or write, "I'll do that job as well as I can." In this sentence, the adverb "well" is modifying the verb "do." With regard to the word "best," it is the superlative degree of the adjective "good." Exercise is good for you. Swimming is better than running. The best exercise is walking. So you see, using "best" as an adverb is incorrect. Hope this helps. -----
Al Diamond Says:
5/29/2007 5:57:23 PM
A question about use of commas: The venerable NY Times in one of its 02/20/07 editorials wrote, "...an aggressive new governor." (NO COMMA after aggressive.) The next day, in another editorial, the sentence was, "...a sweet, funny book whose main character, a smart, curious 10-year-old girl..." (Commas after sweet and smart) WHICH IS CORRECT? In both cases, the adjectives are modifying nouns. ANOTHER QUESTION: Which sentence is correct? 1) I'll do that job AS BEST AS I CAN. OR 2) I'll do that job AS WELL AS I can. Perhaps changing the sentence is advised? THANKS! Your podcasts are wonderful! -----
Shunda Says:
5/29/2007 4:35:08 PM
Just wanted to say that I really enjoyed the special episode featuring tips for writers. While the GG podcast may not be for writers only, I would love more information and tips for writers to be included. Give us more GG! -----
Elizabeth Says:
5/14/2007 11:54:27 PM
Interesting! My children's grammar books say that the preferred response is "I am well." Their books say that when people ask, "how are you?", they are asking about one's state of well-being; therefore, we respond with the word "well" which refers to a state of good health and well-being. -----
Julian Elischer Says:
5/10/2007 6:21:15 PM
As a non American speaker of the English language, I cringe when I hear Americans say "I'm good". I always have the urge to say "at what?" or "Aren't we a bit full of ourselves today?" . -----
Marc Says:
5/6/2007 8:31:39 PM
But doesn't the apostrophe also symbolize missing letters? Shouln't it really be ho' and the plural be ho's to symbolize the missing letters "re" since ho' derives from "Whore?" -----
Grammar Girl Says:
4/29/2007 8:11:43 PM
Ah! You are confused because "feels" can be a linking verb or an action verb depending on how it is used. If you can replace "feels" with a verb of being (e.g., "is," "are," "am") and the sentence still makes sense, then "feels" is a linking verb, and it is OK to use "good" or "bad" (adjectives). If you replace "feels" with a verb of being and it doesn't make sense, then "feels" is an action verb, and you need to use "well" or "badly" (adverbs). -----
Ursula Myers Says:
4/27/2007 11:42:24 AM
Hi Grammar Girl! First of all, I love your grammar tips. English is my second language but I love it dearly and I continuously trying to improve my grammar. Today's topic was harder to understand for me than previous ones but so helpful! I have a question about this sentence: "On the other hand, if you have a sentence such as He feels badly, and you replace feels with is, it doesn't make sense anymore: He is badly." In another segment you said that if I say "he feels badly", he has problems with his ability to feel, rather than saying that is not well. I'm so confused! Can you help? Another question: when is it ok to use parentheses in a sentence. I use them all the time because it's very common in Germany but I don't often see it here. Thanks Grammar Girl! -----
Jeffrey Fuller Says:
4/26/2007 9:10:07 PM
I think both are just as acceptable. I'm sure that in the early days most people used "well", however, because "good" is so frequently used in our culture, its meaning has become understood through common use. One must keep in mind that English is a living language, which means it is constantly changing; often adopting new words (or idioms) from other languages, frequent use of slang, and advancements in technology. -----
jon Says:
4/26/2007 8:02:07 PM
this is a huge thing in america. i can't tell you how many times someone asks me how i am and i'll say, "good, and you?" they'll pause, take a dramatic deep breath and say, "i'm WELL." -----
Rob Brown Says:
4/25/2007 12:27:17 PM
While it may be proper to respond that you are good, what I find is that often people claim that they are doing good. This would be an incorrect use of the word good. I usually correct these people with some sort of comment regarding the fact that only superheroes do good. Ordinary folks with a poor grasp of the English language can only do well. -----
Tim Smith Says:
4/24/2007 5:11:43 PM
I believe this a case of knowing the words that aren't being said. In the interest of brevity, we often drop syllables and even entire words. An awkward form of this phrase would be "Grammar Girl is here," with "here" of course being "in the recording or broadcasting studio." There is also the connotation of "here" meaning "inside the radio" but that is more cultural than grammatical. Fluent listeners reconstruct the meaning from a partial statement based on their experience. I live in a city that is spelled with three syllables and pronounced with two; this is a simple way to identify newcomers or outsiders. We must always be aware of the words and syllables we are NOT using. They can carry as much meaning as the words we are using. -----
Jeff Caylor Says:
4/24/2007 3:04:18 PM
Hey! Great podcast, I posted a response to this, but it has appeared somewhere else on the blog, apparently. My point was, often people ask "How are you doing?" not "How are you?" The answer would be "I'm doing well," not "I'm doing good."
Robert Safuto Says:
4/23/2007 7:29:44 PM
Mignon, Thanks for another great episode. And thank you for your passionate support of the GoToMyPC campaign. Blubrry is definitely sweeter with this and other QDNow podcasts on board. Sincerely, Rob Safuto -----
Karen Says:
4/22/2007 5:00:37 AM
I have nothing to add to this. I just wanted to say that I really enjoy the podcast and learn something new from it each time I listen. Thanks Grammer Girl for doing this podcast! You're the best! -----
Will Ross Says:
4/22/2007 1:45:22 AM
I went ahead and researched this and it turns out that you are both wrong. The grammatically correct way to say this is "IR 1337 NOOB! RTL KEKEKEKEKE THX BYE!" All yer grammers belong to us txt me ltr! I look forward to "going to work now" and "eating a sandwich for lunch" now. mmmmmm SAMMICHES. -TA -----
Gene Says:
4/22/2007 12:06:12 AM
Talk about "snarky!" I'm not sure if Paul is "good" (morally excellent, virtuous, righteous) OR "well" (mentally healthy) if he needs to attempt to cast aspersions on GG's proclaimed effort. At least she puts out the effort to regularly write the column which many find useful, informative and/or enjoyable. Perhaps when asked how he is Paul should simply respond "I am pompous." -----
Gene Says:
4/21/2007 11:51:52 PM
I'd like to see an article on "refer back" as in "When you do it, they are called predicate adjectives, and they refer back to the noun before the linking verb." It seems to me that no one ever "refers forward" and so why can't we simply "refer" rather than "refer back" which seems redundant. -----
John H. Williams Says:
4/21/2007 2:23:18 PM
I think "I am well" may be more common in the United Kingdom than in the USA. I once had a British friend who responded "I am well." I asked him what the opposite of that was. He said, "I am ill." I think they use "I am well, thank you" in a holistic sense. People don't usually say, "I am good." They typically say, "I'm good." The semantic force of this expression is a vague affirmative, once again holistic, and that's all it neeeds to be. -----
Paul Says:
4/21/2007 1:33:38 PM
My point was not just to advocate for "I am well" rather than "I am good." I don't much like either locution. My main object was to refute GG's claim that language freaks' snarky objections to "I am good" derive from some misunderstanding of adverbs, adjectives, and linking verbs. That's just false. The problem with "I am good" is not grammatical but semantic: "I am good" is vague at best, and downright misleading when "good" is heard as "morally excellent", "virtuous", "righteous", "pious", etc. -- the first meanings given in GG's own principal reference. "I am well" has its own problems, including (as GG notes) a narrower meaning than what may be intended. I look forward to seeing the results of GG's "hours of research" on this matter. -----
Tim Lewis Says:
4/20/2007 9:41:49 PM
Unfortunately, here in America, what many people learn in grade 6 is lost by grade 7. Specifically, "good vs. well" is an issue about which many otherwise educated Americans feel very insecure. -----
Grammar Girl Says:
4/20/2007 7:55:02 PM
I have to disagree. "Good" has many meanings, including "agreeable," "cheerful," "healthy" and "optimistic": http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/good I did hours of research on this topic, and I'll be posting my references tonight (including two that say "well" is generally reserved to mean "healthy" when it follows "I am.") I'll concede that "well" can also mean "satisfactory," and my dictionary also lists "good" as a definition for the adjective "well." My point was not that it is wrong to say "I am well," but that is is acceptable to say, "I am good." And I stand by that point. -----
Grammar Girl Says:
4/20/2007 7:43:19 PM
"Grammar Girl here" is just a quirky thing I picked up when I took German in high school. One way to answer the telephone in German is to say, "Hier Mignon," which translates to "Mignon here." In some ways, I think of the podcast as talking to my friends on the telephone, and when I begin, I am imagining that I'm answering the phone. -----
Paul Says:
4/20/2007 7:39:40 PM
Grammar girl messed this one up, but good. The difference between "I am good" and "I am well" is not really grammatical at all -- it has to do with what one wants to convey. Both "I am good" and "I am well" are entirely correct grammatically (as GG notes). GG seems to think that those who object to "I am good" are driven by some confusion over predicate adjectives and linking verbs. Nonsense. The problem with "I am good" is not that it's ungrammatical, but that it conveys the wrong message. "I am good" means something like "I am virtuous" -- and this is seldom an appropriate response to "How are you?" What the speaker almost always intends to convey in such a case is some informal assessment of well-being. For this purpose, "I am well" sounds a little stilted, but it comes much closer than "I am good." -----
Zach Everson Says:
4/20/2007 5:26:42 PM
Per most style manuals, its "hos" (plural), not "ho's" (possessive). -----
Eric Says:
4/20/2007 5:18:16 PM
Grammar Girl, you start each episode with the statement, "Grammar Girl here." Is this a complete sentence? I understand that a single word such as "Stop!" can be a complete sentence. I'm confused because your name is modified by stating that you are here. I do enjoy your show and I learn from it. I look forward to finding out the answer to this question. Eric -----
Kalle Says:
4/20/2007 1:09:03 PM
Nice podcast, but come on, good vs. well? You learn that stuff in 6. grade even over here in germany
marc Says:
4/20/2007 7:39:36 AM
Please help with the whole Don Imus thing: Is it "hos" or "ho's?" -----

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required