Episode Transcript

Addictive Versus Addicting
Episode 16: July 06, 2007

Grammar Girl here.

I'm on vacation this week, but before I left I updated one of the early episodes that I took down a few months ago. I hope you enjoy this new and improved version. 

Today's topic is addictive versus addicting, and we'll get to use all kinds of big grammar words!

An unnamed caller asks:

My friends and I were having an argument the other day about whether TV watching was appropriate or not. And someone said it was addictive and another person said it was addicting, and then it broke off into whether the proper word was addictive or addicting. Could you please explain this whole thing for us?

Would you feel better if I told you that you and your friends aren't the only ones who are arguing about whether the right word is addictive or addicting? There is actually a raging debate, and there is even one unconfirmed account of a tobacco lobbyist trying to use the uncertainty to influence policy.

If you want to be safe, stick with "Television is addictive." Addictive is an adjective, meaning it describes the noun. Remember Schoolhouse Rock? "He was a scary bear. He was a hairy bear. And we described him with adjectives." Hairy, scary, and addictive are adjectives. Schoolhouse Rock was addictive TV.

Now, there are definitely people who argue that addicting isn't a word. They say that addict is a noun, not a verb. However, I did the simple thing: I looked it up, and two out of four dictionaries included addicting—and for those of you who care, one listed it as a transitive verb (1) and the other listed it as a participle adjective (2). A transitive verb is a verb that requires a direct object. An example could be Amy was addicting Steve to Scrabble®. Steve is the direct object of the verb addicting—he's the receiver of the action.

Addicting is the participle adjective of the verb to addict, just as annoying is the participle adjective of the verb to annoy. I don't think anyone would say that you can't describe someone as annoying, and similarly it is OK to describe TV as addicting.

A quick tip is that you can generally tell whether a word ending with -ing is a verb or a participle adjective by testing whether you can add a modifier such as very in front of it. If you can't, then it is a verb; if you can, then it is a participle adjective. In the sentence Television is addicting, it would be fine to add very and say, “Television is very addicting,” so that means it is probably a participle adjective in this case.

So I hope it's clear that it is correct to say both that television is addictive and that television is addicting. Nevertheless, there seems to be a lot of confusion in the world—and a lot of strong opinions—about this topic, so if you have a blog and you want to avoid a flame war, my advice is to stick with addictive.

I have two other points.

First, some people think addictive should only be used to refer to negative things, so to them, referring to Scrabble as addictive would be wrong; but in everyday life it's common to hear positive things referred to as addictive (3).

Second, physicians who treat pain make an important distinction between patients who are addicted to drugs and patients who have a physical dependence on drugs. When people are physically dependent on drugs they get pain relief from taking the drugs and have withdrawal symptoms when they stop taking the drugs. People who are addicted to drugs exhibit behaviors such as hoarding drugs and taking drugs in ways they aren't prescribed or when they don't provide relief from pain (4). So it isn't correct to say people are addicted to drugs solely because they experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop taking them.

That's all. Thanks for listening. You can find a complete transcript of this podcast and my contact information in the Grammar Girl section at QuickAndDirtyTips.com.

References

1. addicting. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/addicting (accessed July 02, 2007).

2. addict. Oxford English Dictionary. Second edition. Oxford University Press, http://tinyurl.com/2t65r5 (accessed July 2, 2007).

3. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage, Springfield: Merriam-Webster. 1994, p. 27.

4. Savage, S., Covington, E.C., Heit, H. A., Hunt, J.,  Joranson, D., and Schnoll, S. H."Definitions Related to the Use of Opioids for the Treatment of Pain," American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Pain Society and American Society of Addiction Medicine, 2001. www.cpmission.com/main/addiction.html (accessed July 2, 2007)

Links

SCRABBLE® is a registered trademark. All intellectual property rights in and to the game are owned in the U.S.A and Canada by Hasbro Inc., and throughout the rest of the world by J.W. Spear & Sons Limited of Maidenhead, Berkshire, England, a subsidiary of Mattel Inc. Mattel and Spear are not affiliated with Hasbro.


Comments (28) for Addictive Versus Addicting |  Subscribe to Comment

Kevin Says:
12/31/2008 5:04:29 AM
Whether people like it or not, English is an evolving language. It doesn't matter how aesthetically pleasing it is! "Addicting" can function as a verb or a participle adjective whether you like it or not. Similarly, "addictive" is an adjective. I imagine people argue that "addicting" isn't a word and, after finding out otherwise, they'll fall to the excuse that they don't like the way it sounds. Thanks, Grammar Girl, for presenting the facts. =]
Liz Says:
12/17/2008 5:59:46 PM
To all of you non-Americans out there who have posted on this topic, I (an American) completely agree with you! "Addicting" just makes people sound uneducated! I actually rarely hear it, but I guess it all just depends on who you hang out with. I happen to hang out with people who had basic grammar drilled into their heads for years and years, so that might have something to do with it. :)
Milander Says:
10/26/2008 5:24:45 PM
Please note that the above explanation, well given and knowledgable, only applies to American English grammar. A British native speaker would never say "Television is very addicting." An interesting post and a site I will visit more but please be aware that there are not only vocabulary differences between native English speaking countries but also grammatical differences.
Apple Says:
6/25/2008 2:51:38 PM
I concur... :]
Charles Carson Says:
6/11/2008 2:36:19 PM
I would argue that "addictive" and "addicting" are both acceptable, but they have different meanings. "Addictive" is an adjective used to describe something that causes an addition to itself, as in "an additive drug" or "television is addictive." "Addicting" is derived from the verb "addict," which means 'to cause someone to have an addiction to something else', as in GG's example "Amy was addicting Steve to Scrabble." Therefore, "addicting" is only correct as a predicate adjective if it's describing a person or thing that gets someone addicted to something else. For example, one wouldn't say "Cigarettes addict children" but would say "Tobacco companies addict children to cigarettes." Therefore, "Amy is addicting" in that "she addicted Steve to Scrabble" but "Scrabble is addictive." It is possible that this subtle distinction will be or already has been lost.
Kate Says:
5/30/2008 2:09:10 AM
XP
Troy Says:
11/20/2007 11:57:42 PM
I found this addicting vs. addictive interesting because I am Australian, and it is viewed that the word addicting does not exist - at least here. No one ever says 'addicting'. Whenever my American friends use 'addicting' it just sounds very uneducated. So I am wondering if this is an American thing, or if other English speaking nations are coming across the same thing.
Andie Says:
10/24/2007 12:09:03 PM
Also, if you say something wrong long enough, throwing "very" in front of it is going to sound right. That's not a very good example in this case. Plain and simple: "Addicting" cannot be an adjective or a participle adjective.
Andie Says:
10/21/2007 4:43:59 PM
Okay, I feel bad because I really didn't read the whole article. But I do have a few things to ask/say. I've noticed that many dictionaries, against what I consider "better judgment", are starting to include common mispronunciations and newly made-up words as being correct. I wonder if perhaps the dictionaries are including "addicting" now because people so often use it, not because it's correct. I can see how it would be correct if the context were to go as follows: Joe Schmoe Coffee wants to make sure they have a large percentage of drinkers. They put special chemicals in their products which end up addicting the drinkers to their coffee. I don't see how "addicting" works unless it is followed by "who" the thing is addicting. Addicting would have to be a verb, not an adjective or a participle adjective. Perhaps I am incorrect, but this is what makes sense to me.
Kris Says:
7/11/2007 4:42:20 PM
What a wonderful surprise to find that you addressed the difference between "addiction" and "dependence" when it comes to using medication to treat chronic pain. As someone who has lived with chronic pain for more than 15 years, it was a wonderful bonus to find it tossed in there where I wasn't expecting it. Thank you, thank you for getting this very important distinction correct, and out there. I've recently discovered you since I got my first iPod, and I have been enjoying your archived reports. Keep up the good work! -----
Patricio Says:
7/10/2007 11:48:12 AM
Aardvark, Thank you very much for your advice, you are very kind. Regards, Patricio Santiago, Chile -----
Holly Says:
7/9/2007 3:49:59 PM
I was surprised to notice on the QD NOW homepage that Mr. Manners' site is listed as "Mr. Manner's homepage". How could GG let this apostrophic catastrophe happen on her own website? :-) -----
Aardvark Says:
7/8/2007 7:20:19 AM
Hi Patricio, aardvark suggests that unless your use of pronouns is clear, you will create an ambiguous pronoun reference. In your example, the reader does not know to whom the we refers. Another way to make your meaning clear is to replace the pronouns with nouns. If we reach agreement, then our organization can teach yours our methodology. Hope this helps. -----
Patricio Says:
7/7/2007 4:06:32 PM
I’m a fan of Grammar Girl podcast and it has been very useful to better understand how to express myself in English. I have a question regard how to differentiate “we” from “we”. Let me explain because I know it sounds rare. Please consider the following sentence. “If we reach agreement, we could teach you our methodology”. The first “we” is used to refer to both “your organization” and “our organization”, and the second only to talk about “us”. I suppose that there are ways to express it in a less confusing way, what do you suggest? Regards, Patricio -----
Antonio Polo Says:
7/7/2007 4:04:48 PM
Hey, thank you very much for that website, grammar is the most important thing in any language, every tongue has its basics rules and if you don't know that you tend to be a low quality speaker even if you pratice more and more. So the secret is practice on talking and grammar knowledge. Keep up with the gorgeous work... -----
Terry Says:
7/6/2007 7:41:18 PM
GG, I just want to tell you happy I have been since one of my friends exposed me to your podcast. As a recovering (nuclear) engineer, grammar was never one of my strong suits. Okay, make it my worst subject in high school and college. Sure I love Conjunction Junction, but it never carried over into academia. Since my non-scientific secret passion for creative writing has been growing when I first start plundering around with blogging in 2004, I have been more conscientious of my grammar as I look to attract that big book deal, or other media exposure that will make me an official published author (I don't care if I sell 1 or 1,000,000 books). When I discovered Grammar Girls QDTips, I had a nice backlog of episodes to listen to and went on a listening blitz. My ears experience euphoria as I was hearing all these wonderful rules and tricks but my brain went into overload. Thankfully, I can take you along with me on my commute to work and listen to back episodes. So keep up the awesome work! Cheers, Terry (from Knoxville, TN) -----
Roberta Says:
7/6/2007 6:14:20 PM
Hi, I am Brazilian and it's been really instructive to listen to your pod cast. It is a great and enjoyable way of learning such a hard subject. Now I have two questions for you: 1) Is there any difference in saying "...it's been instructive to listen to..." or "...it's been instructive listening to.."? 2)Is it correct to use the 's for possession if we are not talking about a person? Ex: the cat's house; Harvard's review etc. Thanks. -----
db Says:
7/6/2007 5:46:15 PM
GG, Love the site, love the tips, use them often, however... It's "withdrawal". Sorry. -----
Grammar Girl Says:
11/20/2006 5:31:14 PM
Oh, the horror! I misspoke, and I'm very sorry. -----
Jeff Says:
11/20/2006 2:27:17 PM
I like your podcasts and wish lots more people would listen to your good advice. However, toward the end of episode 16, while talking about your Web site, you said, "Of course there's transcripts..." I don't know why this is such a pet peeve of mine, but it is. "Transcripts," being plural, takes the plural "are," not singular "is." You are in good company with this mistake, though. I hear it all the time, even on NPR! -----
jn Says:
10/28/2006 3:21:34 PM
It was great to find your podcast by accident a couple of days ago! I've listened to as many of your episodes as possible since then. As a follow-on to your "redundancy" discussion, how about addressing singular-vs-plural verbs and contractions? I frequently hear "'s" used in speaking when the verb should have been "are". (As in a closing sentence of this podcast's audio, in which you said, "Of course, there's transcripts..." ;-) Thanks for the effort you put into the podcast, and thanks for helping your listeners take grammar a bit more seriously! -jn- -----
burl Says:
10/24/2006 7:48:41 AM
I've been enjoying your podcasts! Thanks for putting in the time and effort. In this entry, you mention using a variety of dictionaries. I want to jump in and point out that not all dictionaries are created for the same purpose. The two types of dictionaries are those that describe how words are being used (or have been used) and those that are prescriptive, that is, those that tell us how to use a word. I know that you know this and I only point it out to stop people who might think that just by quoting something from a random dictionary that they have me over a barrel. A particularly grating example is the peculiar penchant of folks in Seattle to cobble together the letters s-n-u-c-k and call it a word. As in, "We snuck behind their backs and changed 'cannot' to 'can not'!" instead of the elegant "we sneaked in and whacked them with sticks." http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/usage/snuck Thanks again and keep up the good work. Burl -----
Grammar Girl Says:
10/1/2006 5:38:41 PM
Thanks Anglela! Writing your blog in English is a great way to practice, and it looks like you are doing a good job. Have fun back at school. -----
Angela Says:
10/1/2006 4:11:29 PM
I'm here just wanna say that I really love your podcast!! And I have found it incrediblely useful. Thank you sooooo very much. I'm an English learner in Beijng, China. Sometimes I found English grammar is hard to follow. And your podcast comes in handy. I'm so grateful that I found you:) Plz feel free to visit my blog. I wrote it in English. I'm sure you'll find a lot of grammar mistakes there, lol. I just can't help with those~ But the good news is that, I'm still working on my English and maybe you can help me with all that in your podcast:) I'd be honored.^^ So... guess I'll catch ya on my ipod:) -----
Grammar Girl Says:
9/29/2006 5:18:34 AM
Hi Ken, I remember learning the rule about not using however to start sentences too, but I investigated recently and found that it isn't true. I don't remember where I did my investigating, but I definitey remember looking into it, because when I talk I sometimes do start sentences with however and I wanted to make sure it was OK for the transcripts or if I would have to train myself to speak differenty. (The transcripts on the web are just that: transcripts. I try to write them out to be as gramatically correct as possible, but sometimes I make a choice that sounds more natural when I am speaking.) Grammar Girl PS: I felt bad saying I didn't remember where I looked it up, so I did a quick search and found at least one page that verifies what I remember learning: http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~mark/research/However.html. -----
Ken Says:
9/29/2006 5:01:15 AM
Grammar Girl, I'm curious why you began a sentance with the word "however"? I recently, however late, began seriously studying grammar and find it a very poor choice. Typically, the writer means "but". But so many are confused and believe that one should never start a sentance with a conjunction. Anyway, I ask because I am a novis when it comes to grammar. -----
Grammar Girl Says:
9/28/2006 4:56:57 PM
That's great! I'll put hyphens on my topic list. -----
avwill Says:
9/27/2006 9:55:43 PM
This topic makes me think of my favorite sweatshirt. In big, black letters on a white background, it says,"Does anal retentive have a hyphen?" Someday, you'll have to do a podcast on hyphens. -----

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required