Episode Transcript

“Historic” Versus “Historical”
Episode 133: September 09, 2008

Grammar Girl here. Today’s topic is the difference between the words “historic” and “historical.”

A listener, Denise, wants to know if she should say, "We sell historic replicas" or "We sell historical replicas." Was an event "a historic occasion" or was it "a historical occasion"? These are good questions because it’s easy to get these two words confused. They sound alike and their meanings overlap, but the two words are used differently (1).

Guest-writer Bonnie Trenga answers Denise’s questions after this message from Audible because it's free audiobook time again. Audible is the Internet's leading provider of spoken word entertainment. Get a free audiobook download of your choice when you sign up today. Log on to audiblepodcast.com/gg for details.

Now, Bonnie writes:

“Historic”

“Historic” is an adjective that means something important or influential in history. So Denise should say, “The treaty was a historic occasion.” It was an important occasion. It would be incorrect to say, “We sell historic replicas” unless they are replicas that are important to history. You’ve probably heard TV announcers refer to “historic treaties” or perhaps you’ve visited some “historic houses” or “historic battlefields.” All of these were important or famous things in history.

“Historical”

“Historical,” on the other hand, is an adjective that refers to anything from the past, important or not. Denise should say, “We sell historical replicas” because these replicas are from the past; they’re probably not so important. A “historical occasion” would be just some occasion in the past; it wasn’t necessarily an important occasion. “Historical documents” are just documents that record the past. You’ve probably read a “historical novel” or perhaps even a “historical romance,” which are books set in the past. There is nothing especially important about these books; if they were, they’d be “historic books.” The Gutenberg Bible would be a historic book, for example.

Memory Tricks

It’s common for people to mix these two words up. One style guide laments, “Examples of ‘historic’ used incorrectly for ‘historical’ could easily run for several pages” (2). William Safire said something that might help you remember the difference: “Any past event is historical, but only the most memorable ones are historic” (3). I’ve also created an odd memory trick to help you: You can remember the meanings of these two words by thinking that “ic” is “important,” and they both start with i, and “al” is “all in the past,” and those both start with a.

“A Historic” versus “An Historic”

Throughout this podcast so far, I’ve said “a historic” and “a historical.” There are conflicting theories on whether to use “an” or “a” before these words. It’s all a matter of whether you pronounce the “h” sound. One authority, Bill Walsh, feels that Americans incorrectly use “an.” He acknowledges that “some British people pronounce ‘historic’ as ‘istoric,’ and that has led many Americans to believe ‘an historic’ is correct. It is not.” He points out that if you said the words “historic” and “historical” alone, you would hear an “h” sound, so you should say, “a historic” and “a historical” (4). Further, nobody would ever say a song was “an hit.” You'd say the song was “a hit,” and the “hi” sound at the beginning of “hit” is exactly the same as the sound at the beginning of “historic” and “historical.”

On the other hand, The New Fowler's Modern English Usage, a traditionally British-leaning style guide, holds an opposing view (3). It recommends that you say, “an historic” and “an historical,” but “a history.” I personally prefer “a historic” and “a historical,” but no matter which way you choose to say these words, you’re going to offend someone.

So, to sum up, something historic is important, something historical is all in the past, and in my opinion it's better to say “a historic” instead of “an historic.”

Administrative

For a free audiobook, visit audiblepodcast.com/gg. When you sign up for an account, you'll get a free audiobook. Audible continues to grow and now has over 40,000 titles you can download and play back anywhere, just like this podcast. One of the books you could choose is The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski. It is the breakout novel of the year and is a retelling of Hamlet in a Wisconsin dog kennel. It's getting rave reviews from the likes of Stephen King and Publishers Weekly. So log on to audiblepodcast.com/gg to get a FREE download when you sign up today.

This show was written by Bonnie Trenga, author of The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier, who blogs at http://sentencesleuth.blogspot.com.

You can find me, Grammar Girl, and all the other great Quick and Dirty Tips podcasts at QuickAndDirtyTips.com. Lately I've been finding Small Biz Tech Girl's shows to be very helpful. She's reviewed a lot of new services from online storage sites to project management systems, and I've been thinking of trying them. Check her out.

That's all. Thanks for listening.

References

1. American Heritage Guide to Contemporary Usage and Style. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005, p. 833.

2. Garner, B. Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003, pp. 407-8.

3. Burchfield, R. W, ed. The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage. Third edition. New York: Oxford, 1996, pp. 361-2.

4. Walsh, B. Lapsing Into a Comma: A Curmudgeon’s Guide to the Many Things That Can Go Wrong in Print—and How to Avoid Them. Chicago: Contemporary Books, 2000, p. 96.

 
 

Comments (9) for “Historic” Versus “Historical” |  Subscribe to Comment

Megan Says:
11/11/2008 3:24:12 PM
I know this has more to with medical terminology, but is there a difference between words like "neurologic" and "neurological", or "psychologic" and "psychological"?
Megan Says:
11/11/2008 3:12:04 PM
I know this more to do with medical terminology, but is there a difference between words like "neurologic" and "neurological", or "psychologic" and "psychological"?
Zork Dude Says:
11/4/2008 11:28:28 AM
Sarah Palin just made this mistake 11/4/08 - said that her voting in Alaska today is "an historical event". The number of grammitical mistakes she makes is amazing.
toby Says:
9/29/2008 1:05:36 AM
I took a Master's Degree in History (here in 'Merica!) and was taught to use "an historian" in professional writing. We were also made aware of changes in US English texts that came about because publishing houses are cheap (i.e., they want to save money by saving ink and space); a few examples were: "US history" vs. "U.S. history" "president Nixon" vs. "President Nixon"
Lori Says:
9/12/2008 6:56:20 PM
Would it not be correct instead of, “The treaty was a historic occasion,” to word it as "The treaty-signing was a historic occasion"? I don't believe a treaty is an occasion.....
Grammar Girl Says:
9/10/2008 1:05:45 PM
My misspeak is repaired. (Thank you, Dan.)
Grammar Girl Says:
9/10/2008 12:43:27 AM
Oh, shoot! I'll see if I can fix the audio and replace the file.
Jessica Says:
9/9/2008 3:53:56 PM
There was a bit of a slip in the audio -- instead of "A 'historical occasion' would be just some occasion in the past" you said, "A 'historic occasion' would be . . ." I guess even Grammar Girl mixes up the two words ;)
Anita Says:
9/9/2008 12:14:51 PM
The voice in the audio was very fast. Is there a way to slow her voice down on the web site?

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required