Episode Transcript

When to Leave Out "That"
Episode 110: June 06, 2008

Grammar Girl here.

Today's topic is the word “that.” When do you need it, and when can you leave it out?

Also, I'll have an announcement at the end of this show about extra book giveaways and my book tour.

Now, guest-writer Bonnie Trenga writes,

Today we’re going to talk about when it’s OK to omit the word “that” in a sentence. The sentences “The turkey sandwich I ate yesterday had too much mayonnaise” and “The turkey sandwich THAT I ate yesterday had too much mayonnaise” mean the same thing. In that sentence, it’s perfectly fine to leave out the “that.” In a similar vein, the sentences “I said I would eat a sandwich” and “I said THAT I would eat a sandwich” are equal. So are you allowed to leave out the “that” in such cases? Well, it depends.

"That" Can Help Sentence Flow

When you’re deciding whether to keep or omit your “that,” you need to consider how your sentence flows. Many times, it’s just a matter of personal preference. Some people think adding “that” improves the flow of the sentence and makes it easier for the reader to understand. Others believe they should delete every seemingly unnecessary “that” because they want to maintain an economy of words (1). I’m all for cutting unnecessary words, but I often like to keep my “that” if it helps the rhythm of the sentence. You’ll have to judge whether using “that” in your particular sentence improves or hurts its flow. Sometimes it helps to read your paragraph aloud to see if you’ve got the right rhythm. The AP Stylebook, which is typically used by journalists, suggests you use a “that” when in doubt (2). It advises, “Omission can hurt. Inclusion never does.”

Sometimes "That" Is Necessary

Now, there are several cases when a “that” might be necessary. If your sentence already has another “that” or two, you might not want to complicate it more by adding yet another “that” (3). One of the sentences above falls into this category. I said, “Some people think adding ‘that’ improves the flow of the sentence.” I could have also said, “Some people think THAT adding ‘that’ improves the flow of the sentence,” but I thought two cases of “that” would be a bit much.

Another time you should consider using a “that” is when your sentence could be ambiguous or misunderstood. Steven Pinker, a linguist, warns about what he calls “garden path sentences” (4). These are sentences that seem to mean one thing but then turn out to mean something else. Sometimes, keeping a “that” can help you avoid such problematic sentences. Pinker explains, “These are called garden path sentences, because their first words lead the listener ‘up the garden path’ to an incorrect analysis.”

Here an example of a sentence that leads the reader down the wrong path when you omit the word “that”:

Aardvark maintains Squiggly's yard is too big.

Without a “that,” the reader is initially led to believe that Aardvark maintains, as in mows, Squiggly's yard. If you add in a “that,” it's clear from the beginning that Aardvark just has an opinion.

Aardvark maintains that Squiggly's yard is too big (5).

Pinker goes on to say that garden path sentences are “one of the hallmarks of bad writing” because readers have to wend their way back to the beginning of the sentence to figure out its meaning.

It is sometimes tricky to know if your sentence is ambiguous because you, the writer, know what you mean. I always find it useful to put aside my work for a while and then read it again with fresh eyes. You could also consider having a friend or colleague read over your work.

Keep Parallel Construction

Two more points about “that” (6). First, be careful to maintain parallel construction. For example, this sentence is incorrect: “Natalie realized she had left her keys in the car and that she didn’t feed her fish.” In this sentence, Natalie is realizing two things, but the sentence uses only one “that.” This sentence would be better if you used “that” twice: “Natalie realized THAT she had left her keys in the car and THAT she didn’t feed her fish.”

Avoid the Double "That"

You also need to ensure you don’t accidentally put in a double “that.” This sentence is not right: “Natalie knows that if she doesn’t remember to feed her fish that the poor little guy will die.” It needs just one “that,” the first one: “Natalie knows THAT if she doesn’t remember to feed her fish, the poor little guy will die.” A comma after “fish” will help readers understand the sentence.

So, it's up to you to decide when you need a “that” to improve the flow of your sentence. Remember that some people prefer writing that omits unnecessary “thats,” but it's also more dangerous to leave them out because doing so can lead to misunderstandings.

The Age of Engage

Now for books, books, and more books! I have three copies of The Age of Engage by Denise Shiffman which will go to Norma, Jignesh, and Steven. They're subscribed to the free e-mail newsletter, so they were automatically entered in the book giveaway. Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google said every marketer should read The Age of Engage, and I like it because the author says Grammar Girl is one of her favorite podcasts.

Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing Give Away

Next things are really ramping up for my book tour! The book comes out July 8, and I'm going to be giving away five copies per show until then. You're automatically entered if you're subscribed to the e-mail newsletter.

Get a Free Chapter

And I'm also giving away a free chapter and quick tip guide by e-mail to everyone who is subscribed to the newsletter. If you're subscribed, you'll just get it in your e-mail when it's ready. And if for some reason you don't want the wonderful newsletter with its free grammar tips, you can also use a different button at the website to just sign up for the free book chapter and quick tip guide.

Book Tour Cities

Information about the book tour cities is also starting to show up on the website. I'm adding city information as the plans become firm.

Make-It-Green Girl

You'll find all of this great stuff at quickanddirtytips.com where you can also find our newest podcast, The Make-It-Green Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for an Earth Friendly Life.

The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier

Finally, thanks again to today's guest writer, Bonnie Trenga, who is the author of The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier and who blogs at http://sentencesleuth.blogspot.com.

References

1. Walsh, B. Lapsing Into a Comma: A Curmudgeon’s Guide to the Many Things That Can Go Wrong in Print—and How to Avoid Them. Chicago: Contemporary Books, 2000, pp. 212-13.

2. Goldstein, N., ed. The Associated Press Stylebook and Libel Manual. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1996, p. 202.

3. Garner, B. Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003, pp. 783-84.

4. Pinker, Steven. The Language Instinct. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2000, pp. 211-12.

5. Fogarty, M. Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. Henry Holt & Company: New York, 2008, p.170-71.

5. Lutz, G. and Stevenson, D. Grammar Desk Reference. Cincinnati: Writer's Digest Books, 2005, pp. 194-96.


Comments (14) for When to Leave Out "That" |  Subscribe to Comment

faisal Says:
6/13/2008 6:10:57 AM
Hi Grammar Girl, I have a question. Sentences: 1. I hope to make the guy work better. 2. I hope to make the guy works better. Which is correct and what's the rule? Oopps, would this be 'a question' or 'some questions'?
faisal Says:
6/13/2008 6:02:47 AM
Hi, I'm a Malaysian malay. there are times when I use 'that' to replace 'which' since I hate using either of those words twice. after reading this post, I finally understand that switching 'which' with 'that' is not all the time necessary. Thanks grammar girl.
Mo Says:
6/12/2008 8:06:19 PM
Thank you for the information. I use APA and APA hates the word "that". I am glad someone else agrees "that" is sometimes necessary to use :>
Mo Says:
6/12/2008 8:04:39 PM
Thank you for the information. I use APA and APA hayes the word "that". I am glad someone else agrees "that" is sometimes necessary to use :>
Bonnie Trenga Says:
6/9/2008 9:31:47 PM
Bert, Bonnie here (the guest-writer of this episode). I think "hadn't fed" or "didn't feed" are both OK, but I probably should have kept the verbs parallel (both with "had"). Quite astute, Bert!
Grammar Girl Says:
6/9/2008 8:49:03 PM
Hi, rpmason. I believe you could either take out the first "that" or replace the second "that" with "access"--either would be fine. I'd probably replace it with "access" just because it seems a little clearer to me.
The French Chef Says:
6/9/2008 4:55:02 PM
Squiggly will be served as escargot for dinner this evening :P
rpmason Says:
6/9/2008 9:34:25 AM
The Serial THAT: I recently wrote an an email that contained "I'm not requesting access to the server. I understand THAT THAT isn't allowed". I should have 1) taken out the first THAT, 2) replaced the second THAT with 'access', or 3) rewritten the second sentence.
Jessica Says:
6/9/2008 8:53:47 AM
Thanks Cute Grammer Girl, I always likes your post. Will visit again. Thanks for your social work By http://www.blueunplugged.com
Bert Says:
6/8/2008 6:24:04 PM
Shouldn't "Natalie realized she had left her keys in the car and that she didn’t feed her fish." be "Natalie realized she had left her keys in the car and that she hadn't fed her fish."?
aardvark Says:
6/7/2008 9:05:04 PM
That I do not have to maintain Squiggly's yard is a relief. I do hope, however, that Squiggly's yard has no snail bait.
Kelly Says:
6/7/2008 10:08:30 AM
I was glad to see this topic ... I copyedit TV news and delete "That" every chance I get. (Mostly for word economy) but it was interesting to read cases where I should leave it....
Henry Says:
6/6/2008 6:07:41 PM
Thanks Grammar Girl. Always a great help with English grammar.
Vance Says:
6/6/2008 9:44:53 AM
Thanks Grammar Girl, this is one I've always (unconsciously) wondered about. :)

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required