Episode Transcript

Is "Have Got" Acceptable English?
Episode 122: August 01, 2008

Grammar Girl here.

Today’s topic is whether the phrase “have got” is good English or not.

And now, guest-writer Bonnie Trenga answers an e-mail from a listener, Lee, who says, “A pet peeve of mine is the frequent use of the ‘have got’ phrase, such as ‘I have got a [something or other]’ or ‘I’ve got a [something or other],’ when ‘I have a [something or other]’ is completely sufficient.”

We all have phrases that bother us. I hate it when I see “It was a chill night” instead of “It was a chilly night.” Alas, I get all bent out of shape for no reason. Much as I dislike “chill” instead of “chilly,” there’s nothing wrong with it. Likewise, all four sources I consulted about the “have got” issue agree that this phrase is, in fact, good English.

Added Emphasis

The phrases “has got” and “have got” are somewhat informal and are often contracted, as in “He’s got” and “They’ve got.” Although this expression has long been criticized as an unnecessary substitution for the verb “to have,” it is perfectly idiomatic. It simply adds emphasis (1). In American English, “have got” is an intensive form of “have” (2). For example, if I say, “I’ve got a really big TV,” I’m placing more emphasis on my possession of the TV than if I say, “I have a really big TV.” If you say you haven’t got any money, you’re stressing the fact that you’re broke. Note that you can use “has got” or “have got” only in the present tense. If you want to talk in the past tense about your enormous TV, you would say, “I had a really big TV.” You would probably use expressive intonation to add emphasis.

American English Versus British English

How often you use “have got” instead of “have” depends on where you’re from. In American speech, “the form without ‘got’ is used more than in the UK” (3), so in other words, Americans tend to say, “have” and the British tend to say, “have got.” For example, according to The New Fowler's Modern English Usage*, in Britain, you’re more likely to hear the question “Have you got this book in stock?” whereas in America, “Do you have this book in stock?” would be more common (4). As I’ve said, it’s perfectly fine to say, “have got” if you’re in America, though it is less formal than plain old “have.” Even less formal than “have got”—and probably considered objectionable by most grammarians—is simply “got” by itself. You might have heard of the Spike Lee movie “He Got Game.” I don’t think Spike considered calling it “He Has Game.” “He got” is a very colloquial way of saying, “he has.”

Obligation

“Have got” also has another meaning: to indicate necessity or obligation. Saying, “have got” is a little stronger than saying, “must” (5). So if I’m running late, I might tell my friend, “I have got to go now,” with the emphasis on the word “got.” And my friend might tell me, “You have got to stop being late so often.” When we’re speaking to friends, we might leave out the “have,” as in “I got to go now.” We might even say, “I gotta go now.” These two are considered colloquial English. You shouldn’t write these two sentences in a formal English essay. You can use “must” or “have to” instead.

This show was written by Bonnie Trenga, author of The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier, who blogs at http://sentencesleuth.blogspot.com.

You can reach me, Grammar Girl, at quickanddirtytips.com. Thanks for listening.

*Note: Fowler's is a usage guide whose emphasis, particularly in the earlier editions, is on British English usage.

References

  1. Garner, B. Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003, pp. 381-82.
  2. American Heritage Guide to Contemporary Usage and Style. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005, p. 208.
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_differences. Accessed June 26, 2008.
  4. Burchfield, R. W, ed. The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage. Third edition. New York: Oxford, 1996, p. 352.
  5. American Heritage Guide to Contemporary Usage and Style. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005, p. 216.

Comments (15) for Is "Have Got" Acceptable English? |  Subscribe to Comment

Ezekiel Says:
11/16/2009 12:17:01 PM
This topic is a really simple way to get people to comment on your blog. The debate rages on, but: Why don't American's like "Have Got"? -Because t is less clear. Why don't Britons like "Have Gotten"? -Because it is much less 'Brittish', requires that one understand what they are talking about and is more work. The British will vehemently tell you that using the word "Gotten" is simply incorrect. They are stubborn fools who think they have the monopoly on English. We'll see what they decide after 300+ years of teaching the English language to THE ENTIRE WORLD (aka Almost all of America's immigrants).
GINNY Says:
10/2/2009 8:28:52 PM
grammar
Eric Says:
8/21/2009 10:47:58 PM
Tommy, it seems someone has got you confused. "Got" is a past participle of "get" and equivalent to "gotten." The present participle of "have" is "having," and the pluperfect is "had had."
tommy johnson Says:
8/16/2009 3:09:13 PM
The phrase has got or have got is considered nonstandard or in other words the uneducated term for the verb to have. There is no grammatical rule that necessitates the use of this term, and the verb to have, has its specified forms of different tenses already. Present- have or has. Past- had. Present participle- has or have gotten. Pluperfect- had gotten. As you may have discerned, got was not included with any of these tenses.
Bill Says:
7/30/2009 2:05:34 PM
"If you say you haven’t got any money, you’re stressing the fact that you’re broke." Actually, that's not true. If you say you "haven't got" any money, you're saying that you have no money, and that part of the reason that you have no money may be that people tend not to hire people who use phrases like "haven't got".
S Dodd Says:
6/27/2009 2:48:13 AM
The word "gotten" is not grammatical is is un -necessary mainly..One either has or has not..we have "gotten" no way we "have" is more correct....I went to School from 1935 till 1944 and was taught the correct usage why are sure corruptions encouraged..
jasonser Says:
5/25/2009 10:51:52 PM
Can anyone check for me the grammar for the letter below? HI Jason, Sorry for the delay. I suggest you to delete the red one as enclosed. The reason is 1).we should do our best to serve the customer. 2).Before we get the official order ,we should not mention ‘’ take the responsibility …’’ in The official e-mail. Trust you understand what I mean. After that , you have gotten my approval to send the e-mail out. Cheers Steven p.s. By the way, I would like to remind you the business English should be based on 3 principles as follows: 1). Clear ( plus it is the best if you can be concerned about GRAMMAR) 2). Concise 3).organized
Geoffrey Says:
4/17/2009 4:29:14 PM
When I was at school in the 1930's, GOT was always crossed out so I never use it in written work. However, to me, an Englishman living in North America, GOTTEN is far worse. The derivation, I believe is a shortened version of "GOD BEGOTTON"
Andre Winstead Says:
8/9/2008 2:37:19 PM
What is the correct past tense of light, as in "to light a fire"?
Rogerio (Roger) Says:
8/8/2008 7:44:07 PM
Hi My name is Roger and I live in Brazil, I would like to say I am very happy to have this little help develop my english, as you can see I am still learning but thanks anyway.
Stacy Says:
8/4/2008 3:47:29 PM
I always think of Will Smith in Independence Day saying, "I have got to get me one of those!" Since then I realized I do not like the phrase "have got," even when I notice it coming from my own mouth.
rpmason Says:
8/4/2008 2:57:10 PM
From an AP story, "They say the attack marked the first time an animal has gotten loose." 'Has' is present tense and 'gotten' is a past participle, so it should have been 'had gotten' or simply 'got'.
Vanilla Says:
8/4/2008 12:51:16 PM
Thanks for this information. I was wondering about the expression "Had Had". Is this proper english? Hookedonwords
Trish Ritzi Says:
8/4/2008 11:48:59 AM
I can totally relate to this woman's pet peeve because I have the same thing. Isn't it rather repetitive when you say "have got" because the have part already declares that you own or want something. Also, isn't it true that "got" is the only word in the English language that is not really necessary in a sentence at all?
Radu Says:
8/1/2008 3:59:48 AM
There are such examples: I have to go. I must go. I have got to go. So, can "have got to" be considered as a modal verb (a variant of modal "have to")?

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required