Episode Transcript

Proofreading Tips
Episode 21: October 20, 2006

Grammar Girl here.

Today's topic is proofreading.

Here's a question from Corinne that's pertinent to a news story that came out yesterday:

 

I have always had a problem of with my writing I forget the word "the" or I forget to put an "ed" on the end of a word, and it's not because I don't know to do it, but as I type I just seem to forget to put that there. I continue to read over it, I don't find anything, but this has come back to bite me a couple times. So I am wondering if you have any helpful suggestions that you might be able to provide me for how I could improve my writing skills, so when I'm actually typing something, when I go back and reread it that if I forget the word "the" or "of"  or something to that extent, that I actually find it. It's always hard to go back and proof your own writing. And especially with today's technology age, when you have to send out e-mails rapidly with only a response back, I was wondering if there's a way, or something that you do in particular, that helps you with that function.

Well Corinne, the Bank of Kazakh* is probably wondering the same thing, because Reuters and the BBC are reporting that someone at the institution misspelled the word bank on its newly released notes, and they were printed and entered into circulation. So, they have a big, embarrassing proofreading problem.

Before we go any further, I do have some tips, but I also have to say that I feel like a fraud for covering this topic, because I make as many errors as everyone else, and sometimes typos slip through. I try so hard, but typos seem to evade me with impunity. As my father would say, "If you miss one typo, all the others will know," implying that I will forever be an easy mark for sneaky, calculating typos that are out to get me.

So, given my long history with typos, it has become my belief that it's nearly impossible for someone to accurately proofread their own writing and be consistently successful. Think about it: If I produce 1,000 words a day, and I let 1 typo slip by every week, that's actually a 99.986% success rate. If you think about it in terms of letters rather than words, since most typos happen at the level of letters, that 1 typo a week equates to about a 99.997% success rate.

Anyway, I know that's kind of a silly example because for native English speakers every letter isn't a typo waiting to happen, and typos are bad and can get you in a lot of trouble; but my point is that even though you should do your very best to catch them, I also think it's important not to beat yourself up too badly when they happen and to realize that human error is inevitable.

The real key to avoiding typos is to have someone else proofread your copy, and this actually also relates to a question that at least one other person asked, which is if I could discuss the poor state of writing on the Internet.

In addition to the fact that most people don't get a good grammar education, I believe a significant reason you see so many typos and errors on web pages is that most web copy never gets reviewed by anyone but the writer before it goes live. By contrast, copy that you see in newspapers and magazines (in addition to being written by professional writers) goes through an extensive editing process. After a writer turns in a story, it's usually reviewed by multiple editors, including the department editor who assigned it, a senior editor, and a copy editor. Of course these editors all have more training in grammar and writing than the average person writing a blog, and even if you consider text on a commercial website, in my experience, these companies tend to run lean editorial departments and may only have one editor looking at copy before it goes live.

So my primary advice on avoiding typos is to have someone else proofread your work. On the other hand, I know this isn't possible for things like e-mail or rushed projects, so here are four proofreading tips I've collected over the years.

 

1)Read your work backwards**, starting with the last sentence and working your way in reverse order to the beginning. Supposedly this works better than reading through from the beginning because your brain knows what you meant to write, so you tend to skip over errors when you're reading forwards.

2) Read your work out loud.  This forces you to read each word individually and increases the odds that you'll find a typo. This works quite well for me, and most of the typos that make it into my transcripts seem to be things you wouldn't catch by reading aloud, such as misplaced commas.

3) Always proofread a printed version of your work. I don't know why, but if I try to proofread on a computer monitor I always miss more errors than if I print out a copy and go over it on paper.

4) Give yourself some time. If possible, let your work sit for a while before you proofread it. I'm just speculating here, but it seems to me that if you are able to clear your mind and approach the writing from a fresh perspective, then your brain is more able to focus on the actual words, rather than seeing the words you think you wrote.
 
That's all on proofreading. If anyone has other proofreading tips, please post them in the comment section of the Grammar Girl transcripts at quickanddirtytips.com. I can always use more proofreading tips, and I'm sure everyone else would appreciate it too!

Moving on to another topic, two people have asked me to clarify the pronunciation of the word etcetera. It is pronounced et-cetera, with a t sound, and not ek-cetera as I apparently said in a previous show. Two of my dictionaries define etcetera as meaning "and so forth," and it's my understanding that in Latin,  et cetera means "and the rest" or "and the others," and it is written out as two words: et and cetera. Although the use of etcetera in English is obviously adopted from the Latin phrase, you write it out as one word, etcetera, in English. [Note: See my correction and clarification in the comments. GG] You generally use it at the end of a list of items to indicate that the list could contain more items and for some reason you didn't list them. Here's a title that uses etcetera: "Question words: who, what, where, etc." And, etcetera is abbreviated etc. So, I've said etcetera enough times now that I hope everyone is clear on the pronunciation.

That's all.

As always this is Grammar Girl. I've included links in the transcripts to pictures of the Cyrillc and Kazakh alphabet because a mix-up between the two was the source of the error on the Kazakh bank notes.  There's also a new poll in the Grammar Girl section of quickanddirtytips.com asking whether you think you are a good proofreader or a bad proofreader. Finally, thank you for listening, and for participating in the audience survey. There have been enough responses now that the results are statistically significant, which is great; and also thank you for your reviews and donations. I really appreciate every little thing you all do!

Links

Cyrillic Alphabet
Kazakh Alphabet


*This should read the Bank of Kazakhstan.
**Backwards may be the British form of the word. Some references say backwards is only used in Britain, and that Americans always use backward. The Oxford English Dictionary makes a distinction between the meaning of backwards and backward, and based on those definitions I chose to use backwards.

Note: I proofread this once on the computer screen and twice on paper (the second time after making minor changes), and when someone else proofread it he still found that a to was missing.


Comments (59) for Proofreading Tips |  Subscribe to Comment

the english patience Says:
3/31/2008 12:04:09 PM
Hi Grammer girlfriend, I have a question about the appropriate nature of correcting others. I have a friend who just can NOT help herself and corrects people all the time.The problem is two fold. One is that she is often wrong and two that she is totally annoying in her quest. How can her friends let her know how inappropriate it is to continually correct people?
o fdasdasd Says:
3/30/2008 5:29:42 AM
dasdas
kandii Says:
3/26/2008 10:59:08 AM
well it seems like every one here has auh promblem with writen well i do to.im use to writen with slang but yeah i'm working on my writen but this web page is helping me out."thank you" every one that help me out i read most of all these comments you guys left well yeah peace...
Katie Says:
3/24/2008 8:48:27 PM
I used to proof read ballots. We used two people to proof read the draft ballot. One person would slowly read the words aloud from the draft ballot while the second person matched what was being read aloud to the original source document. It was time consuming but extremely accurate.
Edward Says:
2/13/2008 8:30:16 PM
1. Use an opaque ruler under the line you are reading and move it down line by line. Works wonders. 2. For common typos, use the AutoCorrect function in Word. I have programmed "fm" to become "from" and I never get "form" anymore.
Edward Says:
2/13/2008 8:29:38 PM
1. Use an opaque ruler under the line you are reading and move it down line by line. Works wonders. 2. For common typos, use the AutoCorrect function in Word. I have programmed "fm" to become "from" and I never get "form" anymore.
phaeton Says:
1/31/2008 8:30:56 AM
"the right to bare arms"? or arm's?
Albert Says:
1/14/2008 7:59:04 PM
I'm with Joe Weintraub on words I keep typing incorrectly. I often find "you" when I meant "your", and "form" when I meant "from". My other "favourites" are "di" for "did" and "phot" for "photo". I also seem to hold the shift key down too long when I type "We" and frequently get "WE". There have been many good suggestions, but so many of us think that we haven't the time to check properly. But that does not excuse the many contributors who have addressed their comments to "Grammer Girl".
Albert Says:
1/14/2008 7:50:11 PM
Let's not forget that there is another Latin phrase,"et alia", which can be abbreviated to "et al.", that means "and other things". So you shouldn't use "et cetera" to means "and other things".
saba Says:
12/5/2007 2:56:01 PM
i need really good tips for next year when im in junior high. i need help on my grammar a lot please help me
Savannah Says:
12/4/2007 8:24:28 PM
Dude! I like grammer girl, thats part of our school homework!!!
me Says:
11/26/2007 1:40:33 AM
Anonymous Says: 7/3/2007 1:24:53 AM I was suprised to see that you made an obvious grammatical error on this episode. In the fourth paragraph, you said "...impossible for someone to accurately proofread their own writing..." I am sort of disappointed that you would not realize that "someone" is a singular pronoun and therefore needs another singular pronoun (their is a plural pronoun) such as "his/her." Miss/Mr Anonymous, don't be sad, please read GG episode 29 and you'll know it wasn't a grammatical error; it's a style.
John Says:
11/15/2007 4:45:03 PM
This is my first visit to the Grammar Girl site (after reading a story about it in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. And what do I find? Repeated misuse of the term "proofreading," by both visitors to the site and GG herself. If we're going to talk about proofreading, let's get clear about what that is. A proofreader simply makes sure that the words that have been set in type match the words that the writer put on paper. If was valuable work back when typesetters had to take copy that was produced on a typewriter and turn it into leaded type that could be printed. I will concede that good proofreaders (at least in non-union shops) saved many a newspaper reporter from awful errors by spotting them and pointing them out. But that wasn't really part of the job. With the demise of hot type, almost all copy goes from the writer to one or more editors to type, or, in some cases, from the writer to type without ever passing through the hands of an editor. But in any event, the topic being discussed here is "editing," not "proofreading," since the errors in need of correction were introduced by the the writer, not by someone else setting the writer's words in type.
David Says:
8/15/2007 12:29:42 AM
I agree with Tom. I first found out about software that converts text to audio when I had to read a mound of books. Since then I have used this software to listen to my technical manuals while I drive. I personally prefer TextAloud with the AT&T Natural Voices plug-in. I have found numerous errors that I had previous just read over without noticing. PS GG, I LOVE YOUR PODCASTS!
Pankaja Says:
7/25/2007 9:35:52 AM
One more tip on proof-reading. Running a spell check often helps. I may intend to write "of", but may end up writing "o". Spell checks help to capture such typos. -Regards, Pankaja
Anonymous Says:
7/3/2007 1:24:53 AM
I was suprised to see that you made an obvious grammatical error on this episode. In the fourth paragraph, you said "...impossible for someone to accurately proofread their own writing..." I am sort of disappointed that you would not realize that "someone" is a singular pronoun and therefore needs another singular pronoun (their is a plural pronoun) such as "his/her."
KCrandall Says:
5/30/2007 7:19:51 PM
If you are looking for an empowering writing program that might involve your entire community, check out either the National Writing Project or one of its many local affiliates. The NWP seeks to promote relevant, realistic writing community wide. I was a secondary English teacher for several years. During that time I had the wonderful opportunity to work with The National Writing Project.
Cag Says:
5/29/2007 10:41:02 AM
I would like tips on how to proofread while I am transcribing medical reports. The emphasis is on speed, and also when I release a job it is gone forever. Help!
Comen Says:
5/21/2007 8:06:45 PM
A proof copy is a version of a manuscript that has been typeset after copyediting. Proof typescripts often contain typographical errors introduced by mistyping (hence the word typo to refer to misplaced or incorrect characters). Traditionally, a proofreader checks the typeset copy and marks any errors using standard proof correction marks (such as those specified in style manuals, by house style, or, more broadly, by the international standard ISO 5776, or, for English, the British Standard BS-5261:2). The proof is then returned to the typesetter for correction, and in many cases the production of a second proof copy (often known as a revise). The term proofreading is sometimes used incorrectly to refer to copy-editing. This is a separate activity, although there is some overlap between the two. Proofreading consists of reviewing any text, either hard copy (on paper) or electronic copy (on a computer) and checking for typos and formatting errors. This may be done either against an original document or "blind" (without checking against any other source). Many modern proofreaders are also required to take on some light copy-editing duties, such as checking for grammar and consistency issues. http://blogs.officezealot.com
laurie marrone Says:
3/28/2007 6:04:11 PM
subscribe me to this blog
Emily Says:
3/27/2007 6:20:06 PM
i liked this site cuz its mostly answered my homework 4 me but i think you need a better name that just "Grammar Girls" :)
Catherine Says:
2/26/2007 9:09:19 AM
Dear Grammar Girl: About two minutes into your 10-18-06 podcast on proofreading ("100 Proof"), you state, "....nearly impossible for someone to accurately proofread their own writing...". Now, my question is about your use of the singular "someone" with the plural "their." I simply must find out if the old-school rule of using "his/her" or "one's" instead of "their" with the singular "someone" or "anybody" is now considered obsolete. The hair automatically raises on my head each time I hear this grammar goof. Do you have a podcast which addresses this issue specifically? If so, can you please direct me to it? I would so appreciate your help in untangling my tousled tresses! Thank you.
Grammar Girl Says:
2/13/2007 12:14:47 AM
Laurie from Colorado called in to point out that I didn't mention using spelling or grammar checkers in word processing and e-mail programs. I left it out because I thought it was too obvious, but on further reflection, I have seen a lot of documents that could benefit from a run through a spell checker, so it's probably a tip worth including.
david.cauchi@oag.govt.nz Says:
1/19/2007 2:37:07 AM
I have two tips that don't seem to've been mentioned so far. The first is to hold a ruler or a blank piece of paper under the line of text you're reading. The second is to always re-read a sentence in which you've made a correction. This is to catch the typo sitting next to the one you've just caught. I would also like to reiterate GG's 'fresh eyes' comment. It's always a good idea to proof things at least twice, and the greater the amount of time between reads the better.
Grammar Girl Says:
1/10/2007 9:50:10 PM
This won't work for your specific boo-boos, but I have a solution for people who make frequent errors that aren't words (for example, I always type "pateint" instead of "patient"): if you use Microsoft Word, customize the AutoCorrect feature. About.com has an article with easy instructions.
Joe Weintraub Says:
1/10/2007 7:33:58 PM
Hi, Grammar Girl. I have found that there are specific boo-boo words that intermittently creep into my writing. These are usually the same words each time. Maybe it's when I type too fast and a letter gets dropped from a word, or maybe I have a senior moment and two letters get transposed. I'm not sure what's going on, but the same boo-boo words pop up all the time. If your readers are anything like me and find the same boo-boo words over and over again, they could start keeping a list of those words and run a search-and-replace through each finished draft. For example, two words that haunt me are 'your' and 'from'. Many times, I have found that I dropped the 'r' in 'your' and I'm left with 'you'. Maybe this is when I type too fast. My problem with 'from' is that I transpose the 'r' and the 'o' and the result is 'form'. This is my senior moment problem. By running a search on the words 'you' and 'form', I see each occurrence in the draft and I can quickly determine if ‘you’ and ‘form’ are used correctly or if I have to change them to ‘your’ or ‘from’. A side note: As I edited these comments, I discovered I typed the word 'you' instead of 'your' in the sentence above that begins "If your readers are..." You see? Even in the simplest bit of writing, I can’t get away form those boo-boo words. Darn it! I did it again.
Grammar Girl Says:
1/10/2007 2:45:48 PM
See the episode on generic personal pronouns.
Lemon Lou Says:
1/10/2007 2:20:40 PM
I have a question about agreement. You wrote: "So, given my long history with typos, it has become my belief that it's nearly impossible for someone to accurately proofread their own writing and be consistently successful." Someone to proof their? Someone singular. Their plural. Someone to proof his or her?
Ramon Says:
12/13/2006 8:11:25 PM
Dearest Grammar Girl, I am a high school English teacher and graduate student working on an MA in English Education. With all of the controversy about state mandated testing, No Child Left Behind, and closing the achievement gap, it seems teachers and administrators lost the ability to advise and direct lively and exciting writing programs. Many teachers teach to create a flawless “end products,” but they do not teach the entrancing and soul building process of writing. What would be your advice to high school teachers who would like to create a realistic and empowering writing program that the entire community might find beneficial? Keep up the good work; I am a loyal listener. Sincerely, Ramon Malik Tovar Van Nuys High School, Van Nuys, CA
Irvwill Says:
12/12/2006 5:49:04 AM
My proofreading trick is to read the document upside down. It slows me down just enough to catch my error. I love the blog.
Grammar Girl Says:
12/10/2006 5:15:01 PM
A listener named Dan just wrote in with another great proofreading tip! He writes in one word processor (such as WordPerfect) and after he runs the spellchecker in that program, he transfers the document to another word processor (such as Word) and spellchecks it again. He says that in addition to adding another level of spellchecking, this method also forces him to look at his writing a second time for errors.
Sarah Vivian Says:
12/6/2006 8:54:06 PM
I have a tip on proofreading-- you can always read the paper backwards-- not the words, but the sentences; that will make your brain process the words, rather than processing the entire paper. By the way, love ypur show!! I am only 14 and sometimes have trouble with grammar-- thanks a bunch!!
Tom Says:
11/26/2006 11:15:36 PM
I hate to sound like a purist but... Having studied Latin, I would never write "et cetera" as one word, simply because it's two words! Et means and. Cetera is the neuter plural version of an adjective that means "the other or the rest." (Stadia and media are examples of plural nouns with the same ending.) I seem to recall that in Latin you could use an adjective without an accompanying noun as a noun. In this case it would implicitly mean "other ones" or "other things." http://www.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/lookup.pl?stem=ceterus&ending= And, to be really picky, I would prefer to pronounce it with a hard c, but this would open up a debate among Latin scholars: classical versus church Latin. I realize that today, in English, that's a battle I would not fight because I'd lose. I really enjoy the podcasts, keep 'em coming!
John Stackhouse Says:
11/5/2006 6:07:40 AM
In a former incarnation, I was the deputy editor of The Bulletin,an Australian news magazine. I made it a firm rule that every page had to undergo the scrutiny of "three pairs of eyes". If I had the option, I excluded myself because I am a lousy proof-reader. Keep up the you-beaut work. John PS On quotes: Note the Australian style is to contain a part-quote before a fullstop, as in the above "three pairs of eyes". J
Jim Says:
10/31/2006 5:20:27 PM
Proofreading tip ... If your copy is very simple, but it must be perfect, try reading the copy "upside down" ... same theory as GG's suggestion of reading something backwards.
Craig Says:
10/30/2006 5:21:06 AM
My biggest question regarding quotations is when to place final punctuation before the closing quotation mark and when (if ever) to place it after. I know that in most cases it comes before, but I vaguely recall reading somewhere that there are times when it comes after. Help!
Grammar Girl Says:
10/28/2006 3:35:40 AM
That is such a good point, and is a nice example of why it is so helpful to have someone else proofread your work! By the way, I've been meaning to post here to let everyone know that if you did post a question here in the blog comments, I have seen it and logged it into my spreadsheet for future topics. The more frequently a question gets asked, the higher up on the list it goes.
IHateToast Says:
10/28/2006 12:18:07 AM
would love to see your poll become a bit more specific. i am not a good proofreader when i'm looking over my own written work. i'm average to above average when i'm reading someone else's work. (looking forward to the day when i enter the security code and my computer spits out wads of cash)
Grammar Girl Says:
10/27/2006 4:01:35 PM
John sent me this link to a great letter to the editor in "The Denver Post" about another grammar error on a ballot: http://www.denverpost.com/letters/ci_4549001
nitpicker Says:
10/27/2006 3:13:46 AM
It's actually the central bank of Kazakhstan. Kazakh is the adjective and the name of the language, not the name of the country.
Linda Adams Says:
10/25/2006 5:39:00 PM
Oop!! That should read $186 million less not $186!
Linda Adams Says:
10/25/2006 4:18:12 PM
The importance of proof reading! The Arizona Republic headline today reads "Tiny typo, big effect on ballot". One of our November 2006 ballot propositions includes an ".80 cent tax" instead of the "80 cent tax" intended. The omission of a simple decimal point calculates to $186 less in revenues to cover the proposition's actions. Here's a link to the web site with the full article: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1025ballot1025.html
Grammar Girl Says:
10/24/2006 10:07:15 PM
Ugh! It's fixed. It's a perfect example of why EVERYONE needs a proofreader. I'm off to the Grammar Slammer. (I confess that I'm among the 16% of poll respondents who think that they are bad proofreaders.)
Queenie Says:
10/24/2006 9:31:24 PM
Watch that rogue apostrophe in your footnote about the use of the word "backwards"! It's Americans plural, not possessive. Shame on you Grammar Girl!
Jack Merman Says:
10/24/2006 7:08:38 PM
Hey Grammar Girl! I am a bit of a grammar nerd, so you can probably guess that I love this podcast. I am in ninth grade, and last year we learned many of the grammar rules. Listening to many students talk without proper grammar has prompted me to question many rules. There is one rule that I have had many questions on is the rule about plural possessives. By that, I mean when someone is saying that a dog belongs to Jack and Jill (using possessives). Do they say, "Jack's and Jill's dog?" Or is it Jack and Jill's dog? And how does one say your to a group of people? It isnt your's or you's is it? I think that this would be a great idea for a podcast! Also, when writing e-mails, I constantly wonder how do I properly punctuate "P.S.-," and is there a "P.P.S-"? In addition, I have one more idea/question. When should someone say "quick" instead of "quickly"? Anyway, I hope that some of these ideas can be included in a podcast or at least answered personally. Thanks a lot! Keep on podcasting!!!
Mark Says:
10/24/2006 1:29:07 PM
My son's fourth grade teacher promotes the proofreading skill of physically touching every word on a hard copy. Any suggestion from a teacher with more than 50 years of experience certainly warrants some consideration.
Nancy Says:
10/24/2006 12:02:15 AM
Hi, I enjoyed your tips on proofreading. Another benefit to reading your work out loud is that is can help catch punctuation errors. If you read it the way your punctuated it, it may mean something entirely different than what you intended. p.s. I didn't proofread this Nancy
Welborn Says:
10/23/2006 5:28:39 PM
Oops -- meant to reply to Grammar Girl's 'et cetera' correction instead of this post. :)
Jimi Says:
10/23/2006 2:25:51 PM
I have a trick I use to read copy aloud in an office cubicle setting. I pretend I am on the phone and read aloud into the handset. This prevents coworkers from thinking that I have lost my mind and am talking to myself.
Welborn Says:
10/23/2006 4:34:28 AM
Thanks for correcting this. I was a little peeved at the error in the (usually very clean) podcast. As for the pronunciation of 'et cetera,' I think it's a fairly common accent issue, similar to how you seem to say "nu-monic" rather than 'mnemonic,' or GWB says "nuke-you-lar." Pronunciation is important, but as long as everyone knows what you mean, it's not really a problem. For a laugh, though, you should hear Steve Jobs say "Jaguar" (very Californian "jag-wire"). My personal issue is the western "melk" (for "milk") and pronouncing the Ls in walk and talk. A couple nits to pick. James (above), MAC in computer terms is an acronym for Media Access Control, usually used in reference to the MAC address, which is the hardware address of a network entity. The abbreviation for Macintosh is 'Mac.' However, Apple seems to have moved completely to "Mac" for their branding. Grammar Girl (may I call you GiGi?), the title of this podcast episode refers to the measurement of alcohol by volume in alcoholic beverages, but you don't even give a cursory mention to that. As such, though, I think it should be hyphenated. (It is either a compound adjective or noun.) Use of hyphens is another great idea for a show, even though much of it will coome down to style on individual phrases. One last comment: I, too, can fully recommend Bill Walsh's "Lapsing into a Comma," which is my favorite book on grammar by far. Thanks for the great podcast!
Cloy Tobola Says:
10/21/2006 8:55:30 PM
Guess I should listen to all the podcasts before I suggest a new one, huh? Sorry about that!
Cloy Tobola Says:
10/21/2006 8:47:16 PM
One quick comment on the use of etc..... People frequently use etc. after e.g. That's redundant, as by definition e.g. ("here's an example") implies that there are more items than the ones listed. I also see etc. used after i.e. ("that is to say" or "in other words"), but that's generally because people confuse e.g. and i.e. (There's a podcast idea for you!)
Cloy Tobola Says:
10/21/2006 8:42:39 PM
Kudos to Tom for his comment about having your computer read the text back. Personally, I find this to be a WONDERFUL proofing tool, and I highly recommend it to my students. On the Mac, you may need to choose VIEW => TOOLBARS => SPEECH to make the option visible. The feature is also available in Windows, where I believe it's also listed under the TOOLS menu.
James Says:
10/21/2006 12:42:14 AM
I liked todays episode. You gave me techniques I can put to good use. There is one I use that you did not mention. I have a MAC with OS X so I turn on "Text to Speech" and have the MAC read it back. Even though the computer voice doesn't sound truly human, it is close enough to where I can spot problems.
Grammar Girl Says:
10/20/2006 5:16:25 PM
Although etcetera can be written as one word, it means something slightly different from what I said in the podcast. The one-word form of "etcetera" means "odds and ends." For example, "Her purse was filled with etceteras." (See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/etcetera) The two-word form of "et cetera" is what you put at the end of a list of items and what is generally abbreviated as "etc." For example, "Question words: who, what, where, etc."
Daniel Says:
10/20/2006 4:33:19 PM
Regarding "etcetera": I have always been fond of a spelling of "etcetera" I found in many of the fact books I've read that were written around 1900. "&c." This, strictly speaking, is an archaic abbreviation, but it lends such a charm to the work that I can't help but use it in informal contexts (such as newsgroups, weblogs, email, &c. :-) (Interestingly enough, when I spell checked the above copy, my spellchecker wanted to add a hyphen between "et" and "cetera".)
Scott Perez-Fox Says:
10/20/2006 12:39:37 PM
Cyrillic, Kazahk? It's all Greek to me.
Andrew Gray Says:
10/20/2006 5:28:27 AM
I love the tips for proofreading, Grammar Girl, as it's one of my favorite parts of writing. Something about the red pen on paper. I also read my texts aloud to catch errors, but you know what I find catches the *most* errors? Reading it aloud to another person. I know we may not all have at-the-ready listeners, but I use my parents, while they're doing something like cooking or knitting, as people to listen. Not only do I catch the glaring mistakes of my own work as I read, but they also catch the sometimes awkward if not completely misleading idea threads I work with in my school essays. Revising this way means killing three or four birds with one stone, so I just wanted to share it with you all. Thanks! --Andrew Gray Seattle, WA
Tom Boulden Says:
10/20/2006 5:19:21 AM
I find proofreading difficult, but I've got one trick that really helps a lot. I have my computer read the text aloud to me. My Mac, and I suspect most every recent model of computer, has tools for the hearing and visually impaired. For the latter, a text can be selected and, with the touch of a button, be read aloud in any number of computer voices. These "computer" voices are becoming more and more realistic, and I know Apple's new version of the OS X operating system is going to sound very nearly human. Hearing the text out loud makes errors glaring, that would otherwise slip by me if I read it aloud or silently to myself. Of course, the bane of those relying on computer spell checking to proofread a work, the homonym, e.g. "the right to bare arms," will still slip by, but that is another story...

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required