Episode Transcript

Subject-Verb Agreement
Episode 103: April 18, 2008

Grammar Girl here.

Today's topic is subject-verb agreement, and I'm doing something a little different. This week I have a guest writer for the show, my long-time copy editor Bonnie Trenga, the author of The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier.

But first, it's free audiobook time again compliments of Audible.com, the Internet's leading provider of spoken word entertainment. Get a FREE audiobook download of your choice when you sign up today. For details, log on to audible.com/grammar.

Oh, and I have to correct an error. Last week in one of the Web addresses I said, "Backslash, backslash," which many of you told me is just plain wrong. So I apologize. There are no backslashes in URLs.

Now, let's learn now to boost your immunity to the illness that kills your credibility: subject-verb inflammatory disease.

Good grammar instincts never die—even when the grammarian is lying dazed on a hospital gurney. As I was being rolled to the OR early in my copy-editing career, a grammar error jumped out and got me. When I pointed a weak finger and gasped sharply, my husband must have thought I needed more morphine. A blue sign dared to warn: “The use of cell phones and pagers are prohibited.” “Oh,” thought my relieved hubby. “Just a subject-verb agreement problem.”

I don’t have to look far to find agreement mistakes, even when I’m not in copy-editor mode. I was on hold for my doctor’s office the other day and winced when a sincere voice requested, “Your patience and consideration is very much appreciated.” I did not appreciate that at all, and my patience was as sore as my throat.

I suppose I should go easy on these misinformed medical types. After all, they’re interested in healthy organs, not healthy grammar. If you’re a writer type, though, you don’t want to come down with disagreement-itis. This debilitating ailment afflicts even the best writer, so you’re not immune. If you’re in a hurry, you don’t pay enough attention, and that’s when disagreement-itis strikes. It’s a deadly disease because it kills your credibility and makes your readers feel ill. To avoid the threat of a malpractice suit, you need to start exploring the innards of your sentences—stat!

Before you can do surgery on your writing, though, you need to brush up on your subject-verb anatomy. A singular subject agrees with a singular verb, and a plural subject agrees with a plural verb. A singular subject involves a single item or person: “the rolling gurney” or “a surgical patient.” A plural subject involves more than one item or person: “some badly written hospital signs” or “the shocked copy editors.”

Your subject-verb agreement is most likely fine when the subject is close to the verb, as it is here: “The rolling gurney is about to crash into the unwary sign writer!” The singular subject “gurney” pairs up with the singular verb “is.” I’m certain, though, that you sometimes commit a ghastly grammar goof when the subject is far from the verb. Be especially careful of compound subjects, which contain an “and.” Amnesiac writers forget about the first part of their subject, so they use the wrong verb. This was certainly the problem on Doctor Doofus’ phone system; the compound subject “patience and consideration” belongs with “are,” not “is.”

Now that you’re awake we can examine another reason you might be giving your readers an ulcer. The problem we’re dealing with here is stuff—and, mind you, “stuff” is a real medical term. This sneaky stuff distracts you into using the wrong verb. The troublemakers that come between your subject and verb include prepositional phrases (such as “in the operating room”) and “that,” “who” or “which” clauses. Let’s look back at our friend the hospital sign that read "The use of cell phones and pagers are prohibited." The prepositional phrase “of cell phones and pagers” is in the way. The subject of that sentence is “use,” which is singular, so the verb should be “is.” And that is that.

Have you been forgetting to get regular agreement checkups like our errant sign writers? I guess I’ll forgive you—if you promise to perform a mistake-ectomy immediately. It’s actually quite easy. Simply find your subject and circle just the word (or words) that form the subject—and ignore everything else. Then, underline the verb and check if subject and verb match. If they don’t, berate yourself for a few minutes and then fix the problem. Take this sentence: “Doctor Doofus, who needs a new phone message, and Nurse Nincompoop, his fiancée, are eloping tonight.” The subject is… what? Ah, yes, circle both “Doctor Doofus” and “Nurse Nincompoop”--the plural subjects. Forget about the erroneous phone message and the lucky fiancée. Next, underline “are eloping.” It’s a match! Plural subjects--plural verb.The wedding can commence, and no one will have a heart attack.

All these circles and underlines might seem tedious, but please mark up your pages until your subject-verb inflammatory disease is cured. Both you and your readers will feel much better if you examine your work thoroughly and get rid of careless errors. My surgeon certainly was thorough; he triple-checked that he didn’t leave any surgical instruments in me. Thanks, Doc. Your patience and consideration are much appreciated! You probably don’t have to check your work three times—once should be sufficient; twice if you write hospital signs for a living.

I hope you enjoyed my mixing it up a bit by bringing Bonnie Trenga in as a guest writer. This piece originally appeared in Writer's Digest, and if you enjoyed it, you can find more of Bonnie's work at http://sentencesleuth.blogspot.com. And, as I said, she is also the author of The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier, where she takes similarly fun approach to grammar and which you can buy from a link on quickanddirtytips.com.


Free Audiobook from Audible.com


Speaking of books, it's free book time again, compliments of Audible.com--the leading provider in spoken word entertainment. Audible has over 35,000 titles to choose from to be downloaded and played back anywhere--just like this podcast. I went through my library of Audible books tonight and was remembering how much I enjoyed a book called John Adams by David McCullough. There's a different book about John Adams on the best-seller list this week, but the book I listened to came out in 2001. Since you listen to this podcast, I know you like to learn, and I learned so much that I didn't know about John Adams from this book. His wife Abigail played a huge role in his life, and if you think politics can get ugly now, it was just as bad, if not worse, back then. I really think you'd enjoy this book, so log on to audible.com/grammar to get a FREE download of John Adams, the one by David McCullough, or an audiobook download of your choice when you sign up today. I shouldn't have to tell you this, but grammar is spelled with an a: g-r-a-m-m-A-r. Again, for your free audiobook, go to audible.com/grammar.

Questions and comments for me go to feedback@quickanddirtytips.com or the voicemail line at 206-338-GIRL. You can also read the full transcript of this podcast at www.quickanddirtytips.com, where you can leave comments and find the other great shows including Money Girl, The Mighty Mommy, and The Get-It-Done Guy.

That's all. Thanks for listening.

 

 


Comments (32) for Subject-Verb Agreement |  Subscribe to Comment

rpmason Says:
5/5/2008 4:32:18 PM
"... if something presents a grammatical problem, sidestep it." I agree wholeheartedly. Sometimes, though, you can't just rewrite it. Maybe your Sr. Vice President insists on including in a presentation and you're just doing your best to not embarrass yourself with her words. Maybe you simply can't reduce your complex thought to "See Dick run. Run Dick run." (Don't shoot me -- the last example was simple hyperbole.)
Spork Says:
5/4/2008 9:09:07 PM
This episode is the perfect argument against using "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun. The subject and verb don't agree because "they" is plural. You cannot use "they" to mean he or she because the subject and verb do not agree. It confuses the reader to use a plural pronoun in place of a singular one, so please stop doing it.
Spork Says:
5/4/2008 9:08:40 PM
This episode is the perfect argument against using "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun. The subject and verb don't agree because "they" is plural. You cannot use "they" to mean he or she because the subject and verb do not agree. It confuses the reader to use a plural pronoun in place of a singular one, so please stop doing it.
Robert Allen Says:
5/3/2008 8:12:55 PM
With respect to subject-verb agreement on mass nouns, both "the majority of us is/are going to vote" does not sound idiomatic. Why wrack your brain over an illusive correctness or dicker over a pointless point when you can just as well write "the majority of us will vote" or "most of us will vote." To paraphrase Wilson Follett in his book on English usage, if something presents a grammatical problem, sidestep it. Cf "a multitude was/were." If it bothers you to say or wrte "everyone has his book," "all of them have their books."
Robert Allen Says:
5/3/2008 8:10:29 PM
With respect to subject-verb agreement on mass nouns, both "the majority of us is/are going to vote" does not sound idiomatic. Why wrack your brain over an illusive correctness or dicker over a pointless point when you can just as well write "the majority of us will vote" or "most of us will vote." To paraphrase Wilson Follett in his book on English usage, if something presents a grammatical problem, sidestep it. Cf "a multitude was/were." If it bothers you to say or wrte "everyone has his book," "all of them have their books."
Grammar Girl Says:
4/24/2008 2:56:45 PM
Thanks to those of you who pointed out the "me mixing it up" error. I have been on the road all week (which is why I had a guest writer), and I actually noticed the error right before I left and thought I had changed it, but apparently I forgot. Someone will go into the system and change it today. Why it should be "my mixing it up" instead of "me mixing it up" is a good topic for a newsletter or future show. I'll put it on my list!
rpmason Says:
4/24/2008 10:48:06 AM
An addendum to my earlier comment today. In American English, most mass nouns take a singular verb; in British English mass nouns are more likely to take a plural verb. Americans tend to emphasize the group, while Brits are more often emphasize the group's members. See Mike's comment on 4/18.
GO GRAMMER! Says:
4/24/2008 10:25:13 AM
You guys are really mean. You should be grateful that Grammer Girl is taking her time to make this for you. Everyone is human and everyone makes mistakes.
rpmason Says:
4/24/2008 9:43:51 AM
John, I think you’re asking about collective, or mass, nouns. If the noun emphasizes the group it takes a singular verb but if the noun emphasizes the individual members it takes a plural verb. 'The majority is going to vote yes.' and 'The majority of us are going to vote yes.'
John H. Williams Says:
4/23/2008 5:38:43 PM
I recently heard someone say on NPR, "The largest number of uninsured persons are young." This sounds wrong to me, but I know there are some singular nouns that can take a plural verb. Can you comment on this or maybe do a segment on the subject?
rpmason Says:
4/23/2008 9:47:04 AM
Don, Sometimes MS Word's grammar advice is really only a suggestion to double check the usage. Specifically in your 'number of things' example, 'number' also takes a plural verb. If you remove 'of things', the verb remains plural. "A number of people are to blame." "A number are to blame." If you said 'a number is to blame', I’d say, "That darn Four is at it again!"
Deborah Says:
4/23/2008 9:42:33 AM
I just wanted to point out to grammar girl that the book about John Adams on the NYT bestseller list is indeed the same book that she read, by David McCullough. It merely has a different cover because of the recent HBO movie.
Don Says:
4/22/2008 4:26:50 PM
Grammar Girl, I have the same question that Mike had… which is correct? "A number of things is…" or "A number of things are…" Microsoft Word screams at me every time I write what I believe is correct, but then it yells at me a lot when I don't think it should. My personal thing is that the subject is a collective phrase. So you treat it as an unknown multiple quantity. If you substitute the introductory phrase with a whole number greater than one (because this is what is usually implied by the phrase "a number of" – some plurality) then it becomes obvious you would never say "three people is…" you would say that "three people are…" so the correct verb subject-verb agreement would be "A number of people are…" The verb is agreeing with the people not the number! Is that correct? djb
Don Says:
4/22/2008 4:18:57 PM
Sarah Says: 4/20/2008 8:00:54 PM Hate to be picky, but has it become standard English to say "I hope you enjoyed ME mixing it up a bit" rather than "MY mixing it. . ?" Guess we enjoyed YOU, Grammar Girl, not the mixing. Sarah, It depends on what you consider to the object of the verb. If you are enjoying Grammar Girl as she is mixing things up a bit, then her sentence was grammatically correct. If, on the other hand, you consider the act of her mixing it up, then you are correct.
Don Says:
4/22/2008 4:18:02 PM
Sarah Says: 4/20/2008 8:00:54 PM Hate to be picky, but has it become standard English to say "I hope you enjoyed ME mixing it up a bit" rather than "MY mixing it. . ?" Guess we enjoyed YOU, Grammar Girl, not the mixing. Sarah, It depends on what you consider to the object of the verb. If you are enjoying Grammar Girl as she is mixing things up a bit, then her sentence was grammatically correct. If, on the other hand, you consider the act of her mixing it up, then you are correct.
alma Says:
4/22/2008 12:47:42 PM
To be honest English is not my favorite subject. When I write, I just write what comes to mind without thinking about subject and verbs. I think I should concentrate more on grammer because I believe the way you write reflects on the way you speak.
Matthew Carman Says:
4/22/2008 12:21:13 AM
I love your tips. It's been over 25 years since I graduated from college and I have need to relearn the rules of English. I also notice that you are in Gilbert, AZ, my (new) home town.
Tarah Sweeney Says:
4/21/2008 12:33:40 PM
Hi Linda Have a look here.
linda Says:
4/21/2008 11:53:08 AM
I can't seem to find a good explanation of affect v. effect. I'm new to the site - where have I gone wrong?
aardvark Says:
4/21/2008 12:29:16 AM
Duncan, did you miss aardvark too?
Sarah Says:
4/20/2008 8:00:54 PM
Hate to be picky, but has it become standard English to say "I hope you enjoyed ME mixing it up a bit" rather than "MY mixing it. . ?" Guess we enjoyed YOU, Grammar Girl, not the mixing.
Tarah Sweeney Says:
4/20/2008 12:37:30 PM
I also just have to note that the BBC entry was taken directly off the Wikipedia website. I quote the BBC website you referenced: "This entry is from Wikipedia, the user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (more info) and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Any changes made to the Wikipedia article will not be immediately reflected here."
Tarah Sweeney Says:
4/20/2008 12:35:00 PM
Mike, what about this use of 'the European Union has' and this use? And this Google search reveals that no one writes 'the European Union are'. How would one know what company/organisation is considered a 'plural'?
Duncan Elkins Says:
4/20/2008 11:26:53 AM
Belabor medical metaphors much, Bonnie? Did no one else find that gratuitous and distracting? I was missing Squiggly by the time of the honeymoon example. Was it styled this way because it originally appeared in Reader's Digest and had to be "punchy?"
Toby Says:
4/20/2008 8:52:36 AM
What Mike has said is also true for American English. Depending on whether you treat something as a group of people or a single entity you use either the plural or the singular. "The couple is in therapy." v. "The couple disagree about money." (examples from The Copyeditor's Handbook) Another case where the subject-verb agreement is commonly ignored is "the United States": "The United States is a major international coal producer and consumer."
Grammar Girl Says:
4/19/2008 12:40:12 AM
Jessica and Susan, thanks for pointing out the problems! I've fixed them.
Jessica Says:
4/18/2008 11:12:33 PM
Just a little error: You said, "Let's look back at our friend the hospital sign that read 'The use of cell phones and pagers is prohibited.'" Actually, the sign read "are" even though it should have been "is."
Dan L. Says:
4/18/2008 8:05:58 PM
This is an area where sentence diagramming offers utility.
Susan G Says:
4/18/2008 3:53:59 PM
Closing error notice. "And, as I said, she also the author ...." That should be, she's also, or, she is. Just wanted to keep the grammar clean.
Bob Grammer Says:
4/18/2008 1:46:23 PM
Now that you’re awake we can examine another reason you might be giving your readers an ulcer. Just one between them? That's not so bad. ;-) Sorry, couldn't let it pass in an article like this one.
Rich Says:
4/18/2008 7:30:20 AM
What about "number of things" as the subject? Does the "of things" constitute a prepositional phrase that you warned causes trouble with subject-verb agreement? If so, then "number of things" should take a singular verb. Please advise. Thanks.
Mike Says:
4/18/2008 6:23:59 AM
Do note that in British English, subject-verb agreement takes on a new and complex rule. If the subject in its essence is plural, then the verb is written for a plural form. For example, "The European Union are discussing human rights today." The verb "are" is considered appropriate here in British English because the European Union is composed of several European countries, which is plural. In the United States, they would consider "European Union" singular, and would use "is" instead. Queen's profile on the BBC is an example of where that rule is used: http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artist/ndxm/ "Queen are an English rock band..." Because Queen is composed of four musicians, the BBC use "are" when referring to them. A nice trick to remember that rule is to see if the subject can be replaced with the plural pronoun "they". If it can, treat it like a plural subject.

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required