Episode Transcript

Do You Overuse "Of"?
Episode 153: January 16, 2009

Grammar Girl here. Today's topic is nixing the horrid "of."

Almost everyone has a few bad writing habits. They're often the kind of thing experts or even your friends can point to and say "Yup, I know who wrote that." One of my bad habits is that I tend to overuse the word "of." A while ago, I was working on a technical document, and as I read back through it I noticed that there must have been 20 instances of the word "of." Ugh!

Bad Uses of "Of"

"Of" is a preposition, and although it's not an inherently evil word, overusing it can make your writing sound passive and fussy. Here's an example of a bad sentence:

BAD SENTENCE: She is the wife of George.

That's just horrible. It makes me cringe just to say it. It makes me think of Margaret Atwood's book "The Handmaid's Tale," in which the handmaids had names like "Offred" and "Ofglen" to indicate that they belonged to Fred and Glen. They were the handmaids of Fred and of Glen. But I digress.

Here's a better way to say the same thing:

BETTER SENTENCE: She's George's wife.

See? You don't need the "of." The sentence sounds much more straightforward without it. She's George's wife.

I'm hopeful that none of you would actually write, "She's the wife of George," or any other such strained sentence, but more subtle unnecessary "ofs" can slip into your writing if you aren't careful. Here's a more reasonable example: Reporting on some bizarre science experiment, you might write, "The length of the remaining string can be used to calculate how far the snail has moved."

There's nothing really wrong with that sentence, except that it leaves you wondering how to attach string to a snail, but you'd probably get to that later in the paragraph.

Nevertheless, you could tighten up the sentence by rewriting it to say "The remaining string length can be used to calculate how far the snail has moved." See? "The length of the remaining string," compared with "The remaining string length?" The second version, without the "of," sounds more direct.

Good Uses of "Of"

But remember, I said "of" isn't always wrong. There are good ways to use the word "of." For example, "Please bring me a bucket of water." You have to write it that way to show that you want a bucket that actually has water in it. If you tried to rewrite it the way I did the "length of string" example, you'd end up with "Please bring me a water bucket," which has a different meaning. People would think you were asking for a bucket that is meant to hold water, but is currently empty.

You may remember that in episode 128 I talked about using "of" to show possession. "Of" is especially useful when you are dealing with double possessives. For example, if you want to talk about a photo that you own, you probably shouldn't say "That's my photo" because people might think it is a photo OF you instead of a photo that belongs to you. You could say "The photo belongs to me," but you could also use an "of" and say, "That's a photo of mine." The "of" indicates possession as does the word "mine," which is what makes it a double possessive.

I also find "of" to be useful when I'm dealing with a complex trail of possession. I'm not certain this is a rule, but I find it easier to follow something like "He's the cousin of my neighbor's brother" than "He's my neighbor's brother's cousin."

Finally, there is at least one idiom where you need an "of": You need it in the phrase "a couple of." You have a couple of marimbas, a couple of friends, and a couple of feather boas. In most similar phrases the "of" is considered unnecessary, and you can leave it out. You jump off the pier, not off OF the pier, for example, but "a couple of" is a special case.

So although "of" can be useful, it can also clutter up your writing. If using it the wrong way is one of your bad habits, as it is mine, you might want to use the "find" feature of your word processor to search for the word "of" after you've finished your first draft to look for sentences that could stand some rewriting.

Administrative

At our website, quickanddirtytips.com, you can also find a transcript of this show and all the other great Quick and Dirty Tips podcasts. I'm Mignon Fogarty. That's all. Thanks for listening.

Note: Yes, the subheadings are supposed to be a joke.

Sidetracked

Fun things I discovered while researching this topic:

Spell using Flickr images

Find out what your phone number spells

NATO phonetic alphabet (e.g., alpha, bravo, charlie)

Word Neighbors (Thanks to "Dismay" for recommending this link.)


Comments (23) for Do You Overuse "Of"? |  Subscribe to Comment

betty Says:
6/23/2009 6:12:27 AM
My question is still not answered! I agree the word "of" is overused, but my question is, "Do you use of when stating a month and a year only"? I have a doctor who always dictates, "The patient was last seen in January of 2009." Something in the back of my head says this is incorrect, but it has been many, many years since I went to school. I am looking for an answer to this specific question. Thanks for any help.
Rob Says:
1/28/2009 12:54:30 PM
I have a question - one I have been beating my brain over. Is the proper usage "made of or constructed of", or is it "made from or contstructed from"? I've thought it "of" but cannot find anything that clearly say this is correct. Help!
Isabella Says:
1/28/2009 5:53:52 AM
Thank you, John from Lorain. And how do you know Seoul? Seoul is Korea's capital. I am very surprised that you know Seoul. I've heard many of other country's people doesn't know Korea.
Zeeshan Parvez Says:
1/27/2009 9:56:27 PM
Actually, the phrase I mentioned in my previous comment, which reads ""the length of the string which remains can be used to calculate the distance a snail has traveled" may not work because it causes confusion as to whether the verb "remains" refers to the "length" or the "string." I think using two sentences instead of one would work best as I have shown below: "When a snail travels, it leaves behind a string. A person can use the length of the string to calculate the distance the snail has traveled." If one tries to combine the idea these two stentences contain into one sentence, he/she will produce a sentence which will confuse the reader and/or sound awkward. Thanks.
Zeeshan Parvez Says:
1/27/2009 9:44:09 PM
Nice article. I, however, disagree with the example of "remaining string length." Perhaphs, a better way to reword that phrase would be "the length of the string which remains can be used to calculate the distance a snail has traveled." Just my two cents.
NeilP Says:
1/26/2009 7:45:34 AM
The bad use of 'of' that Grammar Girl merely touches on but is a cardinal sin as far as I am concerned is when it follows 'off', as in her example 'I jumped off the pier'. So many people say 'off of', but as far as I am concerned this isn't just unnecessary, it is wrong. To my horror there's a song on the latest Jackson Browne album called Off Of Wonderland. He's one of my heroes but I'll never be able to like this song because of the awful grammar!!! Sorry Jackson!
Diane Says:
1/22/2009 5:18:04 PM
Maybe the length of string wasn't a great example, but I definitely know what Grammar Girl is getting at here. I used to be an "of" abuser, but I've learned to check myself. I can actually catch myself in the act and rewriter on the fly. Letting go of my "of's" has made my writing more clear and direct. Thanks!
Shawn Says:
1/21/2009 4:34:37 PM
I dunno. "The remaining string length" sounds really awkward to me...
arensb Says:
1/21/2009 3:13:58 PM
I find it easier to follow something like "He's the cousin of my neighbor's brother" than "He's my neighbor's brother's cousin." I understand there's research supporting this. Specifically, sentences that require a stack to parse them are harder to understand than those that don't. In the second sentence, your mind has to scribble "he's related to someone" on a note, and put that aside for later. Then it has to scribble "the neighbor has a brother who's related somehow" and put that on top of the first note (this is the stack) and then return to the previous notes once the relationships have been sussed out. The problem is that storing things away for later (the notes) means putting things in memory, which takes effort and time. In the first sentence, there are more fragments that can simply be added to whichever note your mind happens to have in front of it at the time. This involves a lot less shuffling things around in short-term memory, so it's an easier task.
John from Lorain Says:
1/21/2009 10:08:00 AM
I meant to add my belief that "wait in line" is correct, while "wait on line" is not. I say this because "in line" is short for "in (the midst of a) line (of people)." Saying "on line" makes no sense, because no one is "on" a line. My bringing up the idea of "waiting" (in line) just made me remember another misuse of words. Most speakers of American English correctly say, "I will wait FOR you outside." A persistent minority, however, make the mistake of saying, "I will wait ON you outside." The proper phrase for this kind of waiting is "to wait FOR." The phrase, "to wait ON," is reserved for descriptions of service, such as these words of a maitre d': "Good evening, sir. Williams will be waiting on you today."
John from Lorain Says:
1/21/2009 9:55:20 AM
Thank you, Anthony. I just thought of another case, Isabella, in which there is a difference of opinion about whether to use "in" or "on." I believe that most speakers of American English say this: "I am waiting in line." However, there is a significant minority who say this: "I am waiting on line."
Anthony Says:
1/20/2009 11:58:05 AM
I agree with John from Lorain. In any case it's a poor example because a scientific report is usually required to be passive and formal. Being English, I don;t know whether this is an American thing, but 'jumped off of the pier' seems better to me than 'jumped off the pier'. The latter could be ambiguous - could it mean that someone jumped whilst not standing on the pier? In any case, I would tend to use 'jumped from the pier'
John from Lorain Says:
1/20/2009 9:37:08 AM
Hello, Isabella. When speaking of a city or a country, we say, "I live in ____ " (e.g., Korea or Seoul). We also say, "I live in a house" (or "apartment"). When speaking of other things, however, it may be appropriate to use "on." Examples? "I live on an island." "I live on a ship." I am curious to know whether, in speaking of an island that is not itself a country, more people say, "on," or ",in." For example, do more people say, "I live in Manhattan," or "I live on Manhattan." The choice of "in" or "on" before the name of an island may simply be according to local, regional, or even national custom.
Isabella Says:
1/19/2009 10:58:04 PM
One of my friends overuse the word 'of'. It's really getting on my nerves when I am talking with her in English. By the way, When you're saying I live __ Korea, Is it right to say I live in Korea or I live on Korea???
mcisi Says:
1/18/2009 6:32:01 AM
what is grammar in the bisayas
John from Lorain Says:
1/17/2009 7:40:55 AM
Dear saloni, the answer is "a." Mike, I accept your suggestion ("string's remaining length").
saloni p. Says:
1/16/2009 6:18:47 PM
which sentence below is correct, a or b? a) where does the mystery to life lie? b) where does the mystery to life lay?
Sally S. Says:
1/16/2009 5:56:03 PM
I have ALWAYS been overusing of and so. My teacher NAGs at me because of that. Coul youhelp me,PLEASE do a ppdcast on it or maybe snd an E-mail. THANKs!!:-)~~
Mike Says:
1/16/2009 5:02:41 PM
Though I don't find the "length of string" usage to be particularly vexing, I think the following might be a solution to satisfy most parties: The string's remaining length can be used.... Also, wouldn't "my neighbor's brother's cousin" be my neighbor's cousin (assuming the brother isn't a step- or half-brother)?
Tim Says:
1/16/2009 4:40:05 PM
I had an English teacher who was known to shout at an unruly student, "Get out the room!" That always used to bother me because I felt "Get out of the room" sounded better. Are you telling me that not only was she correct, but she was using the preferred form?
John from Lorain Says:
1/16/2009 4:25:41 PM
"Nevertheless, you could tighten up the sentence by rewriting it to say, 'The remaining string length can be used to calculate how far the snail has moved.' See? 'The length of the remaining string,' compared with, 'The remaining string length?' The second version, without the 'of,' sounds more direct.'" I strongly disagree. I think that the second version sounds abnormal and that its meaning is unclear. The problem lies in the fact that "string" is not an adjective and is thus unable to modify "length." The original sentence sounds normal and is clearer in meaning. The second version could be made more understandable by inserting a hyphen between "string" and "length" to invent a compound nonce word, but that would be so artificial as to be undesirable.
Len Says:
1/16/2009 12:15:03 PM
Another bad "of" is when someone writes "I should of...". That's just wrong. (In case anyone's wondering, it should be "I should have...") Oh yes, the link to Spell using Flickr images gives me a 404 error, but it's in a website, so maybe it's supposed to...
Ann Ethen Says:
1/16/2009 6:37:53 AM
Oh, I have been overused 'of'! Especially I write an essay. Thanks for examine myself.

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required